By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a landmark decision, the Osaka High Court ruled that Japan’s refusal to legally recognize same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, aligning with four previous high court rulings. The court found that this violates the constitutional right to equality and the principle of individual dignity. While upholding the lower court’s denial of damages, the decision emphasizes the significant disadvantages faced by same-sex couples due to the current legal framework. This ruling, rejecting the Osaka District Court’s differing opinion, is expected to significantly influence future legal revisions regarding same-sex marriage.
Read the original article here
The Osaka High Court’s recent ruling declaring Japan’s ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional marks a significant step forward, though it’s crucial to understand its limitations. This isn’t an immediate legalization of same-sex marriage; rather, it’s the fifth time a high court has urged the government to amend the law, highlighting a growing judicial consensus. The high court, similar to a US circuit court, lacks the power to overturn the constitution directly; only the Supreme Court of Japan possesses that authority, and it has yet to rule on any of these cases. The path towards legal recognition still requires legislative action.
This landmark decision, made on March 25th, carries weight given the Osaka High Court’s jurisdiction over a significant portion of Japan, encompassing the second largest metropolitan area. The ruling underscores a persistent judicial challenge to a law rooted in Article 24 of Japan’s constitution, a provision originally considered progressive in the post-war era, drafted by the US occupation forces. This article, defining marriage as based on the mutual consent of “both sexes,” remains unchanged, highlighting the need for constitutional amendments.
The ongoing legal battles surrounding same-sex marriage in Japan illuminate a complex social and political landscape. While this latest ruling offers a glimmer of hope for LGBTQ+ rights advocates, it also underscores the limitations of judicial action in achieving social change. The fact that it’s reached this point – five high court rulings echoing similar sentiments – indicates the deep-seated need for reform. The Osaka High Court’s decision, while not immediately changing the legal status quo, serves as a powerful statement, adding pressure on the government to address this issue through legislation.
The celebratory tone surrounding the ruling is understandable; it’s undoubtedly positive news, especially considering the limited legal recognition of same-sex marriage in Asia. Only Taiwan and Thailand currently offer nationwide legal protections for same-sex couples, making Japan’s ongoing legal fight even more significant. The potential for Japan to become the third country in Asia to recognize same-sex marriage is a considerable leap forward. However, it’s important to temper the celebration with a realistic assessment of the hurdles ahead.
It’s also important to acknowledge that this situation doesn’t present a simple dichotomy of progress versus stagnation. While celebrating this legal victory, it’s crucial to avoid idealizing Japanese society. The need for court intervention to address fundamental human rights highlights that, like many other nations, Japan faces significant social issues and isn’t a utopian society free of discrimination. The fact that legal challenges are necessary, rather than social or political consensus driving change, underscores the work that remains to be done. The legal battles themselves highlight the deep-seated societal attitudes that still need to shift.
The historical context of the ban’s origin, influenced by post-war American policies, is fascinating but ultimately irrelevant to the present-day arguments. The historical origins, however, shed light on the complexity of societal evolution, reminding us that even progressive-seeming legislation can become outdated and discriminatory. While the US has legalized same-sex marriage since 2015, many other countries still lag behind, showcasing the global disparity in LGBTQ+ rights. This further emphasizes the significance of Japan’s ongoing legal journey and the global conversation on human rights.
The process of legalizing same-sex marriage varies significantly worldwide. Some countries achieve it through court rulings, others through referendums, and others still through acts of parliament. Japan’s trajectory is unique, adding another layer to the complexities of changing social norms and legal frameworks. The lack of automatic legal recognition underscores the importance of continued activism and political pressure for legislative reform. This underscores the importance of sustained advocacy to ensure the ultimate victory for LGBTQ+ rights in Japan. The legal battle itself, however, is a significant victory in its own right, signaling a potential shift in societal attitudes.