By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian special forces, in coordination with intelligence and artillery units, successfully destroyed four Russian helicopters—two Ka-52 attack helicopters and two Mi-8 transport helicopters—in a single HIMARS strike within Russia’s Belgorod Oblast. The attack, targeting a concealed Russian staging area, highlights the effectiveness of long-range precision strikes deep within Russian territory. The destroyed helicopters, including the advanced Ka-52, represent a significant loss in both military capability and financial value, estimated at approximately $40 million. This operation follows a series of successful Ukrainian strikes in occupied Crimea and underscores ongoing Ukrainian efforts to disrupt Russian military operations.
Read the original article here
HIMARS Strike Wipes Out Four Russian Helicopters in Belgorod
The recent HIMARS strike near Belgorod, reportedly eliminating four Russian helicopters, has sparked significant online discussion. The sheer effectiveness of the strike, seemingly achieved with pinpoint accuracy, is a testament to the capabilities of the HIMARS system and the skill of its operators. The initial reports, along with accompanying video footage, suggest a devastating blow to Russian air assets. The celebratory tone in many online comments reflects a widespread sense of satisfaction and perhaps even a degree of gleeful surprise.
The destruction of what are believed to be two KA-52 Alligator attack helicopters alone constitutes a major success. These helicopters, often touted in Russian propaganda as top-of-the-line attack aircraft, represent a significant investment in Russian military power. Their loss, potentially with crews onboard, significantly diminishes Russian capabilities in the region. Many comments highlighted this specific aspect of the strike, emphasizing the strategic implications of taking out such advanced weaponry. The emotional reactions range from expressions of pure exhilaration to more measured analyses of the military significance.
The quality of available video footage, while not perfect, appears to confirm the successful targeting of multiple helicopters. Some comments acknowledged that the footage isn’t crystal clear and that some strikes may have missed their intended targets. However, the overall consensus appears to be that the majority of the strikes were highly effective. The damage visible in the less-than-ideal video quality strongly suggests that the helicopters were rendered unusable. The argument that even a few misses don’t diminish the overall success is prevalent.
Several comments focused on the type of munitions used in the strike. Discussion ranged from whether cluster munitions were employed, resulting in the wide dispersal of tungsten submunitions, to the use of high-explosive (HE) warheads. Some observers pointed out that the absence of a clearly visible, widespread spray of tungsten submunitions in the footage suggests HE warheads may have been used instead. This debate is less about the efficacy of the strike itself and more about the technical specifications of the weaponry involved. Regardless of the specific munition type, the helicopters sustained significant damage.
One point emphasized in various comments is that even if the strike didn’t result in complete obliteration of the helicopters, the damage inflicted would render them nearly impossible to repair and return to service. The extensive shrapnel damage, regardless of the warhead type, would impact almost every critical component, including the fuselages, propellers, engines, and avionics. The implication is that even if some scrap could be salvaged, repairing these damaged helicopters to operational status would be a massive and impractical undertaking.
The broader context of the conflict naturally influences the reaction to this event. The strike is seen by many as a powerful counterpoint to Russian propaganda regarding the capabilities of their military equipment. The successful targeting of these supposedly advanced helicopters directly challenges the narrative of Russian military superiority. The sheer effectiveness of the strike is seen as a demoralizing blow to the Russian military and a boost to Ukrainian morale, and a reminder of the capabilities of the West’s military support.
Finally, the incident highlights the continuing strategic significance of HIMARS systems in the ongoing conflict. The precision and devastating power demonstrated in this strike reaffirm the critical role of these systems in providing Ukraine with a crucial edge in the war. The strike’s success underscores the importance of continued international support for Ukraine, specifically in supplying advanced weaponry to help counter the Russian aggression. The success against such high value targets certainly provides a cause for celebration.