By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the announcement of a US delegation’s visit to Greenland, including the US second lady and national security advisor, Greenland’s prime minister Múte B Egede condemned the visit as foreign interference and urged the international community for greater support. This visit comes amidst ongoing coalition talks in Greenland following a recent election and past threats from the US president to acquire Greenland. Both Greenlandic and Danish leaders expressed concerns about the timing and nature of the visit, emphasizing the need to respect Greenland’s sovereignty. The Danish government pledged close coordination with Greenland’s future government in addressing the US’s actions.
Read the original article here
Anger in Greenland is boiling over this week following the arrival of Usha Vance and Mike Waltz. The sheer audacity of allowing visas for individuals perceived as actively undermining Greenland’s sovereignty is baffling to many. The sentiment expressed is one of deep resentment and a feeling that this visit represents a blatant disregard for Greenland’s autonomy.
The anger isn’t merely simmering; it’s erupting into calls for immediate action. Many believe Greenland should have denied them entry altogether, labeling them as enemies of the state and barring them from Greenlandic airspace. The suggestion of deportation, even in chains, reflects the intensity of the feelings against these visitors.
This strong reaction isn’t solely focused on the individuals themselves. The accompanying massive military presence, arriving prior to Vance’s visit, fuels suspicion and concern. The perceived connection between this military display and Vance’s husband’s prior comments regarding American takeover of Greenland has exacerbated the situation, prompting accusations of aggression and a blatant disregard for international norms.
The anger extends to broader political implications. Some are calling for Denmark to revoke all American visas and prohibit American military aircraft from its airspace. The argument is that tolerating this behavior now will only lead to further incursions and a greater threat to Greenland’s future. There’s a prevailing sense that if this is allowed, then Greenland’s independence and future are at stake.
The frustration is further amplified by questioning the purpose of the visit itself. Many express incredulity that Greenland would permit a visit from the Vice President’s wife, especially given her and her husband’s outspoken views against Greenlandic independence and their advocacy for American control. This raises questions about the nature of the visit – is it truly for “appreciating and learning about Greenland,” or is it a cover for more sinister intentions? Many believe the visit is part of a strategic intelligence-gathering operation in advance of a potential invasion.
The anger is not limited to the specifics of the visit; it also reflects a broader anti-American sentiment. Some are calling for a boycott of American products and services, expressing a profound distrust of American intentions and actions. The anger points to a perceived pattern of bullying by the United States, prompting calls for a stronger response from NATO allies.
The situation is further complicated by the lack of clarity surrounding Vance’s official capacity for the visit. The absence of a clear invitation from the Greenlandic government has fueled speculation and deepened the sense of outrage. The entire situation feels, to many, as a gross violation of Greenlandic sovereignty and a blatant disregard for diplomatic protocols.
This anger is palpable and widespread. It manifests in calls for everything from simple denial of entry to more extreme measures like arrest and deportation. The prevailing mood is one of profound distrust and a belief that Greenland’s sovereignty is being threatened. The underlying message is simple: Greenland will not be a passive recipient of American actions, and any attempts to undermine its autonomy will be met with fierce resistance. The visit, therefore, has become a symbol of a larger conflict – a struggle over Greenland’s sovereignty and its place in the world.