By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a lawsuit filed by American Oversight, the Trump administration is accused of using a Signal group chat, including cabinet members and Vice President Vance, to discuss a potential Yemen attack. The administration denies discussing classified information, attributing the incident to a low-level employee. Judge Boasberg, previously involved in legal battles with Trump, will now oversee discovery in this case. Trump’s past social media attacks against Judge Boasberg suggest strong negative feelings towards the judge’s involvement.
Read the original article here
Tulsi Gabbard’s recent claim of amnesia regarding a group chat discussing war plans is undeniably perplexing. The fact that this alleged memory lapse pertains to events from just a few weeks prior raises serious questions about her fitness for the position of Director of National Intelligence. Such a significant lapse in memory, concerning matters of national security no less, suggests a level of incompetence that is frankly unacceptable for someone entrusted with such a vital role.
This sudden and seemingly convenient memory loss directly contradicts her statements from just the previous day, where she confidently asserted that no classified information was shared in the chat. This stark discrepancy casts considerable doubt on her credibility and raises serious concerns about potential perjury. The claim of amnesia feels less like a genuine medical condition and more like a calculated attempt to evade accountability.
The gravity of the situation cannot be overstated. We’re talking about discussions involving war plans – matters of paramount importance to national security. To claim to have no recollection of these discussions, especially so shortly after they allegedly took place, is deeply troubling. It suggests a profound lack of attention to detail, an inability to retain crucial information, or perhaps something far more sinister.
The timing of this “amnesia” is also suspect. It conveniently arises after the initial revelations about the group chat, seemingly designed to deflect scrutiny and avoid the consequences of any potential wrongdoing. The very notion of a government official, particularly one responsible for national intelligence, exhibiting such a drastic memory failure is alarming. It undermines public trust and raises profound questions about the integrity of our intelligence operations.
Many are suggesting that this incident should lead to a thorough medical evaluation of Ms. Gabbard’s cognitive abilities. The possibility of early-onset dementia, or other cognitive impairments, is being raised as a legitimate concern. Regardless of the underlying cause, the inability to recall such critical recent events raises concerns about her competence and judgment. The public deserves to have confidence in the mental acuity of those in high-level government positions, especially those dealing with highly sensitive information.
The potential for obstruction of justice and perjury is a significant legal concern that warrants a full investigation. Her previous statements, directly contradicting her current claim of amnesia, provide strong grounds for questioning whether this “memory lapse” is genuine or a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The sheer audacity of such a claim, made concerning events so recent, is astonishing.
The lack of a straightforward and credible explanation for this memory failure further exacerbates the situation. The absence of even a plausible explanation casts significant doubt on the claim’s validity. It would appear that this “amnesia” is less about a medical condition and more about a blatant attempt to dodge responsibility for potentially illegal or unethical actions.
This incident should not be downplayed or ignored. The stakes are far too high. It is essential that a thorough and impartial investigation is conducted to determine the truth and, if necessary, to take appropriate disciplinary action. The integrity of our national security apparatus depends on it. To simply sweep this under the rug would be a disservice to the American public and a dangerous precedent. Ms. Gabbard’s actions deserve careful scrutiny, and the public deserves to know the truth. The suggestion that she might be unfit for her position, due to cognitive impairment or deliberate deception, should be thoroughly examined.