By John Q. Hosedrinker 
France’s rearmament efforts include a €1.5 billion investment to reinstate nuclear weapons at the Luxeuil-Saint-Sauveur air base near the German border by 2035, deploying F5 Rafale fighter jets and ASN4G hypersonic missiles. This strategic move, following discussions about France’s nuclear deterrent, will see the base’s personnel double to 2,000. Further bolstering its air power, France will order additional Rafale fighter jets from Dassault Aviation. President Macron emphasized the necessity of continued defense preparedness in Europe.
Read the original article here
France’s decision to reopen a fourth nuclear air base by 2035, investing €1.5 billion in the process, reflects a broader European trend of rearming in response to escalating geopolitical tensions. This significant investment will see the base’s personnel double to 2,000, supporting F5 Rafale fighter jets and ASN4G air-launched hypersonic nuclear missiles.
The ambitious timeline, however, raises questions about the feasibility of completing such a large-scale project within the proposed timeframe. Some suggest a much faster implementation is necessary given the current global climate, emphasizing the urgency of bolstering Europe’s defense capabilities. The need for speed is underscored by the unpredictable nature of international relations and the potential for rapid escalation of conflict.
The potential for collaboration with other nations is also being explored. Suggestions have been made for a joint air base in Canada, leveraging existing infrastructure like Mirabel International Airport, a former international airport near Montreal with extensive, underutilized facilities. This proposal is fueled by a shared Francophone heritage and a desire for increased defense cooperation, suggesting a strategic partnership could be mutually beneficial.
However, establishing a nuclear air base on foreign soil presents significant logistical and security challenges. Concerns about security protocols, infrastructure upgrades, personnel accommodation, communication systems, and the overall cost of the project are paramount. A thorough risk assessment would be essential, and the project would need to address all concerns before moving forward.
Furthermore, the proposal of a joint nuclear base raises the sensitive issue of its proximity to the US border. While the proposal suggests that it would simply strengthen NORAD and not be antagonistic, the placement of nuclear assets so close to the United States could indeed generate significant tension and opposition. The potential for the US to perceive this as a hostile act cannot be ignored.
The discussion also delves into the broader context of global power dynamics. Concerns are raised about the reliability of traditional alliances, highlighting the need for Europe to strengthen its own defense capabilities and potentially reducing reliance on external partners. The idea of European nations establishing bases in Canada, particularly near the US border, highlights a strategic shift in the global balance of power and the perceived need for increased self-reliance.
The necessity for a robust nuclear deterrent in the face of increasingly volatile geopolitical situations is emphasized. The argument is made that such a deterrent should be distributed geographically to make neutralization more difficult, thus enhancing overall security. The sheer quantity of nuclear weapons held by major powers is highlighted as a key factor influencing the urgency to improve Europe’s nuclear deterrence capabilities.
France’s substantial nuclear power generation capacity is also relevant. While some question the need for additional uranium given France’s existing reserves, the country’s high reliance on nuclear power necessitates a significant and continuous supply of uranium to support its energy production. This underlines the importance of securing access to this crucial resource and possibly contributing to self-sufficiency.
The debate surrounding the Canadian-based airbase also touches on historical relations and cultural ties between France and Canada. The shared language and cultural heritage are presented as advantages for facilitating cooperation. There’s a sense of shared cultural identity and trust.
In conclusion, France’s decision to reopen its fourth nuclear air base is part of a wider effort within Europe to strengthen its defense posture in a changing global landscape. The project involves significant investment and complex logistical considerations. While proposals for international collaboration, such as the joint Canadian air base, offer strategic advantages, they also present potential challenges related to security, geopolitical relations, and the reaction of other global powers. The undertaking underscores a significant shift in European defense policy and reflects a growing need for self-reliance in the face of uncertain geopolitical realities.