By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a U.S. halt to intelligence sharing with Ukraine, France announced it would continue providing military intelligence to Kyiv. This decision comes amidst a broader context of strained U.S.-Ukraine relations and a potential reduction in U.S. aid, prompting French President Macron to order accelerated delivery of French aid packages. The U.S. pause in intelligence sharing, reportedly extending to allies, raises concerns about Ukraine’s defense capabilities. European nations are expected to address increased support for Ukraine at an upcoming EU summit in Brussels.
Read the original article here
France’s commitment to providing intelligence to Ukraine remains unwavering, a reassuring statement made especially pertinent following a reported US intelligence freeze. This steadfast support highlights a crucial shift in the geopolitical landscape.
The notion that the US holds a monopoly on insightful intelligence is demonstrably false. Numerous other nations, including Germany, Britain, and the Baltic states, possess equally valuable intelligence capabilities and are actively sharing information with Ukraine. The halting of US intelligence flow has undeniably created reciprocal limitations, impacting both sides.
France’s decisive action in this context has elevated its standing, presenting a united European front. This stands in contrast to the unpredictable actions of the US, which is now viewed by many as a major security concern. France’s leadership, alongside the substantial aid provided by nations like the UK and Canada, demonstrates a powerful commitment to supporting Ukraine.
The US, conversely, is perceived by some as having betrayed Ukraine and exhibited behaviors consistent with being an enemy state. This perspective stems from various controversial actions and decisions. The suggestion that the intelligence supplied by other nations, including France, might be just as effective—or even better—than that previously provided by the US, is gaining traction.
The criticism leveled against the US extends to its past agreements and subsequent actions. The argument is made that the US, having pledged security assurances to Ukraine in exchange for the dismantling of its nuclear arsenal, has broken this promise. The comparison made is that unlike the numerous countries that offered assistance to the US post-9/11, no such countries have demanded repayment. The current administration’s conduct in this matter is viewed as violating international agreements and norms of proper conduct between allies.
There’s a growing sentiment that the US’s role as a global leader is diminishing. Many believe that France, under Macron’s leadership, is effectively stepping into this void. This is fueled by perceptions that the current US administration is acting erratically and prioritizing internal political issues above its commitment to international relations and its allies.
The contrast between France’s consistent support and the US’s perceived wavering is particularly stark. This includes the criticism levied against the handling of the Ukraine crisis and the US’s past foreign policy decisions. A number of people even suggest that the US intelligence is unreliable and thus not worth receiving.
The perceived shift in global power dynamics is further emphasized by proposals to reform intelligence-sharing alliances, replacing the US within such structures. This is based on the argument that the US cannot be trusted as a reliable ally anymore, citing historical examples of unreliable intelligence and a general lack of consistency in its international relations.
The outpouring of support for France’s actions is widespread. Many praise its unwavering commitment and commend its role in countering US actions. There is a growing sense that Europe is capable of leading the free world, a sentiment strengthened by the collaborative efforts between France, Germany, and the UK. There is a call for a re-evaluation of the relationship between the US and its allies, along with a reassessment of the reliance on US intelligence. The expectation is that more NATO members will follow France’s lead in providing support to Ukraine. The overall sentiment is one of optimism for a more unified, Europe-led world order.