By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration, citing pro-terrorist and anti-Semitic activities on college campuses, threatened to defund universities harboring such actions and to punish involved students through imprisonment, deportation, or expulsion. This culminated in the cancellation of $400 million in federal grants to Columbia University. The administration’s actions, targeting a student of Algerian and Palestinian origin, appear ethnically motivated and align with broader immigration enforcement goals. This raises concerns about the suppression of free speech and the targeting of legal immigrants.
Read the original article here
Even Fox News, the network often seen as a staunch defender of Trump and his policies, seems to be displaying signs of unease regarding the stock market’s performance under his administration. The usually unwavering support for Trump’s economic plans appears to be wavering, at least subtly, as the market’s volatility becomes increasingly difficult to ignore.
The noticeable shift in tone, or rather, the notable lack of positive coverage regarding the market’s decline, is quite telling. For years, Fox News championed the supposed economic successes of the Trump presidency, often highlighting positive market trends as proof of its effectiveness. The current silence, however, suggests a growing concern within the network’s leadership about the long-term implications of the current economic trajectory.
The silence surrounding market downturns is especially striking considering the network’s typical focus on issues that resonate strongly with its core audience. Older viewers, often nearing retirement, are acutely sensitive to fluctuations in their retirement investments. These are the very people who make up a significant portion of Fox News’s viewership, and their concerns about the market cannot be easily dismissed. The network’s lack of commentary speaks volumes about its internal assessment of the situation.
The significant drop in the NASDAQ since the start of Trump’s latest term is hardly insignificant. Such a drastic decline cannot be easily brushed aside, especially by a network known for its constant promotion of positive economic news under the previous administration. This silence indicates a recognition of a significant problem that is far more difficult to spin into a positive narrative.
The observation that Fox News’s avoidance of the topic suggests a deliberate attempt to control the narrative highlights the inherent tension between loyalty to a political figure and the need to report on impactful economic realities. The network faces a difficult choice: remain silent and risk alienating a crucial demographic concerned about their financial security or acknowledge the problems and potentially undermine their unwavering support for Trump.
This apparent shift in approach could be interpreted as a tacit acknowledgment that the economic climate under Trump is far from ideal. The lack of positive spin on the stock market’s performance, combined with the absence of any substantive discussion on the topic, creates a palpable sense of concern.
The contrast between the jubilant predictions made by some Trump supporters at the start of his latest term and the current anxiety is noteworthy. The hope for a quick surge in personal wealth appears to have been replaced with a more cautious, even fearful, outlook. The network’s silence only amplifies this feeling of unease.
The suggestion that this lack of coverage is a calculated strategic move designed to avoid negative consequences is plausible. The network might be trying to delay any decisive commentary until a more favorable economic climate emerges, but the prolonged silence suggests a deeper-seated apprehension.
The speculation that there’s a calculated attempt to manipulate the market by waiting for a strategic time to buy stocks is a fascinating theory. However, the economic implications of such actions are significant and could have wide-ranging ramifications.
Ultimately, Fox News’s current approach regarding the stock market’s performance is revealing. The network’s typical inclination to highlight positive economic news under Trump’s previous administration contrasts sharply with the current lack of coverage. This lack of coverage itself becomes a story, reflecting a deeper concern about the potential long-term impacts of the current economic climate and its implications for their core viewership. The network’s silence speaks volumes.