By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Shopping Trends team operates independently from CTV News journalists. Our recommendations may result in a commission if readers utilize provided shopping links. Full transparency regarding our operations can be found in our “Read about us” section. This disclosure ensures readers understand the nature of our content and potential financial relationships.
Read the original article here
Doug Ford’s threat to halt nickel shipments to the United States is a dramatic escalation in the brewing trade war. The Ontario Premier’s declaration, made on the eve of the impending 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, is a bold move that signals a willingness to inflict significant economic pain on both sides of the border. He’s not just issuing a warning; he’s painting a picture of a potential economic showdown.
This isn’t simply a symbolic gesture. Ford highlights that Ontario supplies 50% of the nickel used in the U.S., making this a substantial lever of influence. Cutting off this critical mineral supply would severely impact American manufacturing, particularly in sectors reliant on nickel for production. This action underscores the gravity of the situation and the potential for wide-ranging consequences.
The threat extends beyond nickel. Ford also reiterated his previous threat to cut off electricity supplies to three U.S. states – New York, Michigan, and Minnesota – impacting 1.5 million homes and businesses. This is a calculated move to highlight Ontario’s critical role in the energy infrastructure of its southern neighbor, and the far-reaching consequences of a trade dispute.
Beyond these significant economic threats, Ford has outlined a broader strategy to retaliate against the proposed tariffs. This includes a proposed law mandating signage indicating Canadian-made products in retail stores. He has also indicated that Ontario will remove U.S. alcohol from its provincial liquor stores, cancel a $100 million deal with Starlink, and prioritize Ontario and Canadian products in government procurement, amounting to roughly $30 billion annually.
Ford’s actions aren’t solely reactive. He’s clearly articulating a proactive strategy to minimize economic damage to Ontario and protect Canadian interests. His support for the federal government’s retaliatory tariffs, promising to match them “dollar for dollar,” further reinforces this commitment to a robust response. The message is clear: Ontario won’t be a passive participant in this escalating conflict.
The intensity of Ford’s rhetoric speaks volumes. His use of phrases like “absolute disaster,” “massive problems,” and “fight like we’ve never fought before” emphasizes the urgency and seriousness of the situation. He frames this as a fight to protect Ontario families, businesses, and jobs.
The potential ramifications of this trade war extend beyond immediate economic impacts. It could severely strain the Canada-U.S. relationship, jeopardizing decades of close collaboration and trade partnership. The threat of cutting off critical resources highlights the deep interdependence of the two economies and underscores the potentially devastating consequences of a full-blown trade war. The uncertainty surrounding the outcome hangs heavy, with the potential for significant economic disruption on both sides of the border.
Ford’s actions are not simply reactive measures. They are a calculated strategy designed to leverage Ontario’s considerable economic strength and strategic position. By directly targeting key sectors and industries within the United States, Ford aims to demonstrate the real-world costs of imposing tariffs on Canadian goods.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of Ford’s threats will depend on several factors, including the response from the U.S. government and the potential for de-escalation. However, his willingness to take such drastic measures underscores the seriousness of the situation and the potential for substantial disruption if the trade dispute intensifies. The coming days and weeks will be crucial in determining the extent of the economic fallout and the long-term impact on the Canada-U.S. relationship. The tension is palpable, and the world watches to see if this bold strategy will ultimately avert a full-scale trade war or serve as the spark that ignites it.