By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent poll reveals strong positive sentiment towards the European Union among Canadians, with 68 percent holding a favorable view, significantly surpassing the 34 percent who feel similarly about the United States. While Canada considers the U.S. its most important partner currently, the poll suggests a potential shift in the next few years, with the EU gaining favor as a primary global ally. This changing perception comes amidst ongoing trade disputes with the U.S. and Canada’s efforts to strengthen ties with the EU, particularly regarding trade policy and responses to U.S. tariffs. Despite this positive sentiment, EU membership for Canada remains legally impossible under Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union.
Read the original article here
Brussels has expressed polite appreciation for the notion of Canadian EU membership, framing it as an honor. However, the reality is that a Canadian accession to the European Union is simply not feasible. The EU’s foundational treaty explicitly restricts membership to European states, a straightforward legal obstacle insurmountable through any amount of goodwill.
This isn’t to say that the idea lacks merit entirely. Many voices, both within and outside the EU, see potential advantages in closer ties between Canada and the European bloc. The economic benefits, particularly increased trade, are a recurring theme. Canada’s vast natural resources and the EU’s substantial human capital could create a mutually enriching relationship. Moreover, the shared values emphasized by many proponents suggest a natural alignment between the two entities.
However, the logistical hurdle of geographic location is a major constraint. Canada’s position across the Atlantic poses an immediate challenge to the fundamental principles of the EU’s structure. Many commenters point out that the very definition of “European nation” isn’t explicitly defined, leaving room for debate, but it’s clear that this isn’t a matter of simple redefinition; the very fabric of the EU’s legal and political existence is rooted in its geographical boundaries.
Several alternatives to full EU membership have been suggested. The CANZUK initiative, aiming to strengthen ties between Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the UK, has gained recent traction as a more realistic path for Canada to pursue deeper international cooperation. This approach might provide a framework for navigating similar geopolitical landscapes and interests without requiring the sweeping changes involved in EU membership.
The concept of a broader, potentially reformed union including additional players beyond the EU is also floated. This vision encompasses a wider range of nations, incorporating countries like Australia, Japan, Mexico, and even the UK, to create a formidable counterweight to other global powers. This strategy would require significant restructuring and negotiation but offers a more comprehensive framework for strategic alignment and economic synergy.
A more pragmatic approach focuses on enhanced bilateral agreements. The existence of considerable trade between the EU and Canada already indicates the groundwork for further cooperation. Strengthening such agreements, creating more robust trade partnerships, and fostering closer economic integration could achieve many of the intended benefits of EU membership without the bureaucratic entanglement of full accession.
While the sentiment of welcoming Canada into the EU family is genuine in many quarters, the legal framework of the EU firmly shuts the door on this prospect. The impracticality of full membership doesn’t negate the considerable advantages that enhanced collaboration between Canada and the EU could offer. Exploring alternative avenues, such as building on existing trade relationships or considering broader, multinational partnerships, provides potentially fruitful avenues for fostering stronger ties. In the end, while the possibility of a Canadian EU membership remains an intriguing notion, the current realities make it a scenario unlikely to materialize.