By John Q. Hosedrinker 
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a sweeping rollback of environmental regulations, aiming to overturn more than a dozen rules concerning emissions, pollution, and the scientific basis for climate action. This plan, described as ending the “Green New Scam,” seeks to reduce regulatory costs and boost business growth by reassessing rules impacting oil, gas, and coal industries. Key amongst the targeted regulations is the 2009 endangerment finding that establishes greenhouse gases as a threat, a decision environmental advocates vow to challenge legally. The move has sparked outrage from environmental groups and some EPA staff, who deem it unprecedented in scale and potentially damaging to public health.
Read the original article here
The EPA administrator’s announcement of a massive rollback of environmental regulations is nothing short of astounding. It feels like a deliberate attempt to dismantle decades of progress in protecting our air and water, and it’s deeply unsettling. The sheer scale of the proposed changes—reconsidering emissions standards for vehicles, pollution limits for power plants, and even the scientific basis for addressing climate change—is breathtaking.
This isn’t just about tweaking regulations; it’s a full-scale assault on environmental protections. The administrator’s claim that this will boost business and infrastructure development rings hollow when weighed against the potential consequences for public health and the environment. The idea that rolling back these rules will somehow magically create a more prosperous future ignores the fundamental interconnectedness of environmental health and human well-being.
The proposed revisiting of water pollution limits for coal plants is particularly troubling. Coal-fired power plants have long been major contributors to water pollution, and loosening these regulations would undoubtedly lead to increased contamination and harm to aquatic ecosystems. Similarly, relaxing air quality standards for small particles, a known health hazard, would directly impact the health of millions of people.
The plan to reassess the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions is equally alarming. This reporting is essential for tracking progress in reducing emissions and holding polluters accountable. Eliminating this transparency would severely hinder efforts to mitigate climate change.
Even more concerning is the potential upending of the EPA’s endangerment finding—the 2009 legal decision that recognizes the link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. This finding serves as the cornerstone for many of the EPA’s climate regulations, and its removal would effectively cripple the agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases. It’s a blatant disregard for scientific consensus and a dangerous gamble with the future of the planet.
The framing of this rollback as a victory for businesses ignores the long-term costs of environmental damage. The economic benefits touted by the administrator are short-sighted and fail to account for the massive costs associated with healthcare, environmental remediation, and the economic disruption caused by extreme weather events exacerbated by climate change.
The cynical dismissal of concerns about climate change as a “Green New Scam” is particularly disheartening. It’s a deliberate attempt to downplay the urgency of the climate crisis and obstruct efforts to address it. The blatant disregard for scientific evidence and the blatant prioritization of short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability is deeply concerning.
The implications extend far beyond immediate economic impacts. Increased pollution will lead to higher rates of respiratory illnesses, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers. Contaminated water sources will threaten public health and the integrity of ecosystems. The increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events will cause widespread damage and displacement.
The sheer audacity of this rollback is breathtaking. It’s an attempt to rewrite decades of environmental progress, to turn back the clock on crucial protections for public health and the environment. And it’s all done under the guise of economic development and common sense. But common sense dictates that we protect our environment, not dismantle the very safeguards that are designed to protect us.
It is impossible to ignore the blatant hypocrisy of this move. While the administrator claims to support addressing climate change, his actions directly contradict his words. The sheer scale of the proposed rollbacks makes it clear that this is not about finding a balance; it’s about dismantling the environmental protections that are essential to our well-being.
The timing of this announcement couldn’t be worse. We are facing increasingly severe consequences of climate change—more frequent and intense wildfires, floods, and heatwaves—and yet the response is to dismantle the very regulations designed to address these challenges. It’s a recipe for disaster. The consequences of this action will be felt for generations to come, impacting the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the planet we inhabit. The long-term costs of this short-sighted decision will far outweigh any perceived short-term economic gains. This is a dangerous gamble with our future, and it’s one that we cannot afford to lose.