By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a CNN appearance, Rep. Jasmine Crockett expressed doubt about the 2028 presidential election, citing concerns about current leadership and echoing previous claims that President Trump is dictatorial and undermining democratic norms. This statement followed a question regarding a potential Ocasio-Cortez primary challenge against Senator Schumer. Crockett’s comments, which went unchallenged by the interviewer, add to her history of controversial remarks regarding Trump and the 2024 election results. Her skepticism about future elections reflects a broader concern among some Democrats about the stability of American democracy.
Read the original article here
The possibility of the United States not holding elections in 2028 is a deeply concerning prospect, fueled by Representative Jasmine Crockett’s assertion that Donald Trump is a dictator intent on undermining democratic processes. This fear isn’t unfounded; Trump’s past actions, including his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and his incitement of the January 6th Capitol riot, paint a troubling picture. These actions demonstrate a willingness to disregard established democratic norms and procedures, raising legitimate questions about his respect for the electoral process.
The concern extends beyond Trump himself. The potential for the erosion of fair elections is evident in the Republican Party’s increasingly aggressive tactics and rhetoric. There’s a palpable sense of unease, with many believing that the GOP is actively working to rig future elections, mirroring the tactics employed in authoritarian regimes. This worry isn’t just confined to a specific segment of the population; a significant number of Americans share this apprehension, fueled by events and statements from prominent figures.
This fear is amplified by Trump’s own words. His past pronouncements about the election process and his stated desire to remain in power indefinitely cannot be dismissed lightly. The potential for him to utilize his considerable influence to manipulate or undermine the electoral system is a serious threat to the foundations of American democracy. This isn’t simply partisan hyperbole; it’s a growing concern shared across the political spectrum, even amongst those who don’t necessarily agree with the means of expressing the concern.
The belief that the 2024 election may have been compromised further exacerbates this anxiety. Allegations of irregularities and manipulation, regardless of their ultimate veracity, have heightened suspicions surrounding the integrity of the electoral process. This suspicion creates a climate of distrust and undermines faith in the fairness and legitimacy of future elections. The potential for such actions to occur again, perhaps on a larger scale, is a significant source of apprehension for many.
The implication that the upcoming midterms could be used as a test run for broader, more significant efforts to subvert the electoral process is particularly alarming. If the Republicans successfully manipulate the midterms, it suggests that they possess the capacity and willingness to repeat these actions on a larger scale in future elections. This would represent a significant escalation of the threat to democratic institutions.
There’s an understanding that the current political climate is unlike anything seen before. The unprecedented polarization and willingness of certain actors to disregard democratic principles make the prospect of a fair and legitimate 2028 election far from certain. The concern transcends partisan politics; it is a fundamental worry about the future of the American democratic system itself.
This isn’t merely about partisan politics; it’s a question of safeguarding democratic institutions. The potential for a future without free and fair elections is a significant and frightening reality that demands a collective response and a clear-eyed assessment of the challenges ahead. The concern goes beyond speculation; it’s fueled by a perceived pattern of behavior and a deep-seated unease about the direction of the country. The consequences of inaction are too grave to ignore.