By John Q. Hosedrinker 
China’s ambassador to Canada recently highlighted the challenges BYD, a major electric vehicle manufacturer, faced while considering Canadian investment, citing “huge difficulties, restrictions and obstruction.” This suggests a deliberate attempt by China to influence Canadian trade policy through the implication of potential future EV investments. The ambassador emphasized the mutual benefits of such cooperation in the EV sector, leaving open the possibility of renewed investment interest. This implicitly links future Canadian trade decisions to the prospect of significant Chinese investment in the EV market.
Read the original article here
China dangling BYD as bait to reboot Canada trade talks is a fascinating development, one ripe with both opportunity and potential pitfalls. The prospect of BYD, a leading Chinese electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, entering the Canadian market is undeniably appealing, especially considering the current high prices of both new and used vehicles. Many Canadians are priced out of the market, and the promise of reasonably priced, high-quality EVs is incredibly attractive. The fact that BYD has already demonstrated a willingness to establish manufacturing in other countries, such as India, suggests a similar arrangement in Canada is feasible.
This strategic move by China leverages a key Canadian desire: the lifting of agricultural tariffs imposed by China. The US isn’t reciprocating with their own automotive tariffs, leaving Canada in a tough spot. The entrance of BYD could serve as a powerful bargaining chip, providing a compelling reason for China to reconsider those tariffs, fostering mutually beneficial trade relationships.
The argument against BYD entering Canada has historically revolved around three main concerns. Firstly, there’s the fear of job losses within the Canadian auto industry. However, the current state of the Canadian auto sector is precarious, with job security already threatened. This concern loses some weight when viewed in the context of a potential manufacturing partnership with BYD, creating new jobs and revitalizing the industry rather than replacing it.
Secondly, there’s the consideration of loyalty to the US. However, this loyalty seems increasingly obsolete, especially as US-Canada trade relations remain strained. Blind allegiance no longer seems beneficial when considering a more economically advantageous partnership with China.
Finally, the national security risk associated with China is undeniably a valid concern. Yet, this risk needs to be weighed against the risks emanating from other global powers, and whether the benefits of a potential economic boost outweigh the potential drawbacks. This comparison allows us to look at the current security threat level from other countries and allows for a more nuanced and perhaps less fearful approach towards the Chinese proposal.
The prospect of a joint venture, where BYD builds factories in Canada and hires Canadians, transforms the situation. This scenario creates jobs, fosters economic growth, and potentially allows Canada to gain crucial EV manufacturing expertise and experience. The increased competition could push Tesla and other established brands to be more consumer friendly, providing more options.
Many are enthusiastic about the possibility of BYD’s superior technology and competitive pricing. BYD’s offerings appear to surpass those of Tesla in some areas, and the promise of affordable, high-quality EVs could revolutionize the Canadian automotive market, particularly within the EV sector. While there are concerns regarding potential dominance and a “race to the bottom” in terms of quality, requiring BYD to establish robust service centers and demonstrate a reliable supply chain could mitigate these risks.
Concerns about China’s influence and potential for data harvesting are valid and deserve careful consideration. However, the strategic opportunity presented by BYD needs to be fully assessed. It’s a complex matter balancing economic needs and national security concerns. The argument to be made is that strategic partnerships often involve navigating these types of complexities.
Ultimately, the decision of whether to allow BYD into the Canadian market is a strategic one that must balance economic opportunity with national security. A carefully negotiated agreement, focusing on jobs creation within Canada and safeguards against potential security risks, could result in a mutually beneficial partnership for both countries. Ignoring this opportunity because of fear seems illogical, especially when presented with a potential solution that addresses many of the concerns. The timing of this potential trade deal is significant, weakening any bargaining power the US had. This presents a powerful shift in global dynamics, demanding Canada consider the new reality presented and navigate it carefully and strategically.