By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Jes Staley, former Barclays CEO, admitted to having sex with a member of Jeffrey Epstein’s staff in an apartment owned by Epstein’s brother. This admission, made during a tribunal challenging his ban from UK financial roles, contradicts his previous claims of a non-personal relationship with Epstein. Staley maintains the encounter was consensual and unbeknownst to Epstein, but the FCA presented emails suggesting a closer relationship, including references to Disney princesses and Epstein’s assertions that Staley was “like family.” The tribunal also explored Epstein’s alleged assistance with Staley’s daughter’s academic career, further questioning the nature of their connection.
Read the original article here
Jes Staley, the former Barclays CEO, has admitted to having sex with a member of Jeffrey Epstein’s staff. This admission came during a contentious cross-examination at the upper tribunal, where Staley is fighting a regulator’s decision to ban him from holding senior UK financial roles. He maintains that his relationship with Epstein was purely professional, despite this significant revelation.
Staley’s admission specifically involved sexual intercourse with a woman at an apartment owned by Epstein’s brother in New York. He acknowledged meeting the woman through Epstein, identifying her as a member of his staff, but claimed Epstein was unaware of the encounter. He described the act as consensual, though the date and the woman’s age were not disclosed in court. This lack of detail raises several questions about the nature of the encounter and the potential involvement of underage individuals.
The timing of the encounter is particularly relevant. Staley stated that he often visited Epstein’s apartment, and on this occasion Epstein was late, providing an opportunity for him and the woman to get acquainted, leading to the sexual encounter. His explanation, however, feels insufficient to fully address the ethical implications of the situation. The casualness with which he describes the encounter is striking, given the context of Epstein’s well-documented crimes and the significant implications for Staley’s career and reputation.
The FCA’s lawyer highlighted additional potentially damning information, suggesting that this staff member may have been instrumental in securing a settlement for Staley with the Epstein estate. Staley, however, denied any awareness of this. The disclosure of this information only further complicates the narrative surrounding Staley’s relationship with Epstein and raises questions about the extent of his involvement in Epstein’s activities. It also underscores the need for a thorough investigation into the connections between Staley and Epstein, far beyond the simple admission of a sexual encounter.
Staley’s claim that his relationship with Epstein was purely business-related is significantly undermined by this admission. The casual, almost nonchalant manner in which he described the encounter with a member of Epstein’s staff in an apartment owned by Epstein’s brother stands in sharp contrast to his previous assertions. This contradiction, along with the additional information about potential settlements, casts serious doubt on the veracity of his statements about the nature of his relationship with Epstein.
Furthermore, the lack of information regarding the woman’s age is deeply concerning. The absence of this crucial detail fuels speculation and rightly raises serious ethical questions regarding the potential involvement of underage individuals in Epstein’s network. It highlights a significant gap in the information presented to the tribunal and underscores the need for further investigation.
The ongoing case highlights the complex web of relationships surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and the challenges in uncovering the full extent of his activities. Staley’s attempt to distance himself from Epstein’s alleged crimes appears increasingly difficult to reconcile with his own admission of a sexual encounter with a member of Epstein’s staff within Epstein’s inner circle. The entire situation underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability within the financial sector and the urgent necessity to address the systemic issues that allowed individuals like Epstein to operate with impunity for so long.
The overall situation leaves a lingering sense of unease. The admission of a sexual encounter, the potential involvement of a settlement, and the undisclosed age of the woman involved, all contribute to a picture that is far more troubling than a simple case of a one-off consensual encounter. The incident raises serious questions about Staley’s judgment and his willingness to engage with individuals known to be involved in highly questionable activities. The outcome of the tribunal proceedings will be crucial in determining the extent to which Staley will be held accountable for his actions and relationships.