By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The remains of Hank Frantz, missing for four years, were discovered in a treehouse on his father’s property after his father’s death. The DeKalb County Medical Examiner’s Office confirmed the identity of the skeletal remains, which are estimated to be months to years old. While the cause of death is difficult to determine from skeletal remains alone, police believe no foul play was involved. The discovery occurred after the family went to settle the father’s affairs following his death in a scuba diving accident in Maui.
Read the original article here
An Atlanta bagpiper died while scuba diving, a rather unusual occurrence prompting many questions. The circumstances surrounding his death are certainly unexpected; scuba diving and bagpiping aren’t typically associated activities, and the combination alone generates curiosity. The image of someone attempting to play bagpipes underwater is inherently comical, despite the tragic reality of the situation. It’s understandable that many would find the scenario absurd, questioning the practicality—or even possibility—of such an endeavor. The “do not play bagpipes underwater” sticker, mentioned in online comments, only adds to the bizarre nature of the situation.
The story takes a much darker turn with the subsequent discovery. The skeletal remains of the bagpiper’s missing son were found on his property. This revelation transforms the initially unusual death into a complex and unsettling event, adding layers of mystery and sorrow. The fact that the remains were discovered on the property adds to the strangeness of the whole scenario.
The son’s disappearance was a significant event in itself. It’s noted that the family believed the remains belonged to their 28-year-old son, who had been missing for four years. However, it’s equally striking that the Decatur Police Department reported never receiving a missing person’s report for the son. This absence of a formal report raises serious questions about the timeline of events, the family’s actions, and the potential involvement of foul play. The lack of a report might explain why there was apparently no investigation into the son’s disappearance, leaving many unanswered questions.
The police statement that “no foul play is expected in either case” seems at odds with the circumstances. The unusual nature of the father’s death, coupled with the discovery of the son’s remains on his property years after his disappearance, certainly warrants further investigation. This apparent contradiction between the police statement and the overall situation is troubling and certainly fuels speculation about what really happened. The lack of a missing person’s report raises the question of whether there was a deliberate attempt to conceal the son’s disappearance.
The age of the father, suggested to be in his seventies, is also relevant. The challenge of accessing a treehouse, where some reports suggest the remains were found, might explain the lack of earlier discovery, especially given the father’s age. It’s possible the father himself was unaware of the son’s presence in the treehouse. This adds yet another layer of complexity to the situation, and leaves room for multiple explanations as to how the remains came to be discovered only after the father’s death.
The entire story possesses a peculiar and unsettling quality, blending the unexpected death of a scuba-diving bagpiper with the long-unsolved disappearance of his son. The seemingly contradictory information—the family’s assertion of a four-year disappearance versus the police’s claim of no missing person report—leaves many questions unanswered and intensifies the mystery. The commenters’ reaction is understandable. The chain of events is bizarre and the story is easily relatable to strange, improbable stories. The overall effect is one of confusion and unease, sparking widespread interest and speculation. The unusual title itself, as many have pointed out, is captivating and almost unbelievable. This underscores the dramatic nature of the events and the inherent fascination with mysteries that challenge our expectations of normalcy.
The case invites comparisons to the works of H.P. Lovecraft, as one commenter noted, because of its unsettling and otherworldly qualities. The juxtaposition of the seemingly mundane—a bagpiper, a scuba diver—with the macabre discovery of skeletal remains creates a unique, jarring narrative. The reaction of many is to express disbelief, questioning the veracity of the story. But the unusual sequence of events and unanswered questions remain. Even with a seeming conclusion – the identification of the remains – more questions arise about the lack of a missing person report and why the son’s body was found only after the father’s death.