By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Effective March 28th, Amazon is eliminating the “Do Not Send Voice Recordings” setting for Alexa devices, mandating that all voice data be sent to Amazon for Alexa Plus processing. This change, driven by the need to improve Alexa Plus’s conversational AI capabilities, removes user choice regarding data sharing. While Amazon claims data is encrypted in transit and deleted after processing, past incidents of data mishandling raise concerns about data security and potential misuse. Users who disable the remaining “Do Not Save Voice Recordings” setting will lose access to features like Voice ID.
Read the original article here
Amazon is canceling a major Alexa privacy feature on March 28th, and it’s raising a lot of eyebrows. The change removes the option to prevent your Echo devices from sending all voice recordings to Amazon for analysis. This means every command, every mumbled question, every accidental activation – all will be automatically uploaded. This is a significant shift, and understandably, many people are expressing concern.
This decision is unsettling because keeping voice recordings local is a crucial privacy feature. Without that option, users are essentially surrendering control over their vocal data to Amazon, with unclear implications for how that data might be used, analyzed, or potentially even shared. The lack of transparency around this change compounds the anxiety.
Many people feel betrayed by this move. The expectation, particularly after investing in a device marketed with specific privacy features, is that those features would remain in place. The feeling of being actively misled contributes to a deep distrust of the company and its motives. The fact that this change is happening seemingly without significant prior notice or warning intensifies this sense of betrayal.
The anger and frustration are palpable. Many users are voicing their dissatisfaction with the current state of the consumer-company relationship, feeling that companies are prioritizing their own data collection and analysis over user privacy and autonomy. There’s a growing sense that customers are forced to accept increasingly intrusive data practices rather than companies genuinely serving customer needs.
Some people are questioning the legality of such a move. There’s concern about potential violations of anti-wiretapping laws, especially when considering the presence of guests in the home whose consent to data collection might not have been explicitly obtained. This is a complex legal area, and there’s uncertainty as to whether liability falls on the user or Amazon.
A lot of the anger stems from the fact that many users perceive the entire Alexa system as fundamentally unprofitable. Amazon has been purportedly losing money on these devices from the start. The argument is made that despite these losses and the limited utility of existing AI technology, the company is still developing and expanding these systems, creating an increasingly concerning level of data collection.
This situation is feeding into existing concerns about AI technology in general. Many people never truly trusted their smart devices; this change only confirms those suspicions. It reinforces the perception of AI as a tool for corporate surveillance and raises questions about the long-term ethical implications of this technology. The feeling of losing control of personal data in their own homes is a major driving factor in the widespread negative response to this decision.
The reactions range from complete rejection and abandonment of Alexa devices to more measured efforts like unplugging or storing the devices away. Many users are actively seeking alternative solutions for smart home automation to regain control over their data.
This situation highlights the importance of digital literacy and awareness. Many people are expressing regret for ever trusting their privacy to these devices. It also reinforces the importance of a critical assessment of the terms and conditions of any service, and the necessity for greater transparency and consumer protection in the tech industry.
The prevailing sentiment is that those who previously worried about Alexa’s privacy implications were right to do so. This change confirms many users’ concerns and has likely spurred many more to reconsider their relationships with smart home devices and the companies behind them. The event serves as a powerful lesson on digital privacy and the value of careful consideration before welcoming such devices into one’s home.