By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Zelenskyy, in an interview with ARD, criticized what he perceives as US rhetoric aimed at appeasing Putin and hastening a peace deal, even at the cost of Ukrainian territorial concessions. He firmly stated Ukraine will not cede legally recognized territory and expressed confidence in reclaiming all occupied lands, emphasizing the importance of upholding international law. Zelenskyy also highlighted the need for NATO membership to be included in any negotiations and disagreed with assessments suggesting that regaining the 2014 borders is unrealistic. He further asserted that a ceasefire, without the restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty, is not a genuine success.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy’s concern that recent US pronouncements are pleasing Putin is a sentiment echoed widely. The feeling isn’t simply about a difference of opinion on strategy; it speaks to a perceived fundamental shift in the US’s geopolitical alignment. This isn’t a matter of tactical disagreements, but a worry that deeply ingrained US foreign policy objectives are being sacrificed.
The perception that Putin effectively won the recent US election is deeply unsettling. This isn’t just hyperbole; it’s a reflection of the belief that a significant portion of the US political landscape is actively working against Western interests, echoing Putin’s own agenda. The implication is that major decisions are being made with a distinct favor toward Russia, leaving many feeling betrayed and abandoned.
This isn’t just about individual politicians. The narrative points towards a broader issue – a suspected widespread influence operation that successfully infiltrated key positions of power. The scale of the alleged influence is staggering, influencing not only political decision-making, but also major media outlets and public perception. The resulting damage to US credibility on the world stage is seen as immense.
The idea that the US is now an ally of Russia is a shocking proposition, but one that some find increasingly difficult to dismiss. The evidence, as perceived, ranges from overt actions to quiet compromises that suggest a dangerous normalization of Russia’s behavior. This goes beyond simple appeasement; it suggests a strategic reorientation that places US interests – as traditionally understood – secondary to those of Russia.
The perceived unwillingness of the US to actively counter Russian aggression in Ukraine, combined with the vocal support for Russian interests within the US political sphere, is seen as a betrayal of trust by the rest of the world. The suggestion that the US might prioritize trade and economic relationships with Russia over supporting Ukraine leaves many feeling exposed and vulnerable. The fear is that this signals a larger shift away from traditional allies and toward a transactional relationship with authoritarian regimes.
The concern isn’t just about Ukraine; it extends to the future of global security and the very fabric of international alliances. The belief that Russia is manipulating the US to achieve its geopolitical goals is a critical concern. The lack of apparent countermeasures or resistance within the US political structure only further strengthens this disturbing view.
The accusations of direct collusion between key figures in the US and the Russian government are seen as more than mere speculation. The details alleged are significant enough to demand a serious investigation. The perceived silence and lack of decisive action from appropriate authorities further fuels anxieties about the depth of the problem.
The argument that supplying weapons doesn’t grant the US mineral rights in Ukraine highlights a growing frustration with the perceived transactional nature of US foreign policy. This isn’t simply about moral questions; it’s about the perception that the US is using military aid as leverage for future economic gain, potentially to the detriment of Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Ultimately, Zelenskyy’s statement isn’t merely a criticism of current US policy; it’s a cry of alarm about a fundamental shift in the global geopolitical landscape, one which he and many others fear could have devastating consequences. The perception of US weakness and alignment with Russia is viewed as emboldening Russia and undermining the stability of the international order. The implications of this alleged shift are seen as deeply problematic and potentially catastrophic for countries that have previously relied upon the US for support.