By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Zelensky firmly rejected claims of a $500 billion Ukrainian debt to the United States, a figure cited in a proposed US-Ukraine minerals agreement. This agreement, in its initial form, demanded Ukraine cede 50% of its rare earth minerals without reciprocal security assurances, a condition Zelensky deemed unacceptable. The president’s statement categorically denies the existence of such a substantial debt. Notably, a separate mention of a $100 billion debt was similarly refuted.
Read the original article here
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion. This isn’t simply about acknowledging a debt; the far more significant issue revolves around the proposed relinquishment of 50% of Ukraine’s mineral rights without any accompanying security guarantees. This situation highlights a complete lack of progress in negotiations, leaving the US seemingly empty-handed and potentially conceding ground to Putin. The sheer disparity between the alleged $500 billion debt and the actual $120 billion in US aid provided to Ukraine underscores the absurdity of the demand.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion because the aid provided wasn’t a loan but rather assistance. It’s illogical to demand a return many times the initial aid value. Furthermore, relinquishing sovereign territory, especially after years of fighting for its control, is simply unacceptable. The notion of Ukraine surrendering significant resources for questionable security guarantees is profoundly flawed, particularly given the lack of concrete commitments from the US.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion because the demand is unjust. The current situation demands a focus on the aggressor, Russia. Any deal should be predicated upon the preservation of Ukraine’s territorial integrity and shouldn’t mirror the same resource surrender as a capitulation to Russia, albeit with a veneer of diplomacy. While substantial financial compensation might be considered if it guaranteed the return of Ukraine’s 1992 borders, even this requires strong security guarantees. Without them, it resembles a terrible deal, trading one aggressor for another.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion because the US’s proposition lacks any meaningful security guarantee. It’s essentially asking Ukraine to gamble its future for an uncertain outcome. The sheer audacity of this proposal is highlighted by the fact that it’s being made by a country that arguably owes Ukraine a debt for its sacrifice and resilience in the face of Russian aggression. The implied exchange—a massive financial commitment for a mere possibility of reduced aggression—is absurd and insulting.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion. The current geopolitical climate further complicates matters. The US’s reputation has taken a hit, making any guarantee of protection suspect. It seems highly unlikely that any agreement would be reached with the current administration in power, as they appear more interested in furthering their own self-serving interests rather than supporting Ukraine. This situation points to a profound failure in diplomacy, characterized by unreasonable demands and a disregard for Ukraine’s significant contributions.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion because the current proposal lacks credibility. It seems like a maneuver designed to undermine Ukraine’s standing and potentially pave the way for further Russian encroachment. The US’s behavior mirrors that of a mafia, transforming assistance into fabricated debt and leveraging it for undue gain. Instead of fostering trust, the US is eroding it, jeopardizing future alliances. The demand is not only economically unreasonable but also politically damaging.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion because of the deeply unfair nature of the proposition. The US provided aid, and it’s fundamentally wrong to demand a financial return far exceeding that aid. The very suggestion should be met with outrage. The fact that such a demand is being considered speaks volumes about the present state of US foreign policy, characterized by short-sighted self-interest and a profound disregard for the sacrifices made by Ukraine.
Zelensky: Ukraine will not admit debt to the US of either $500 billion or $100 billion. The implications extend far beyond the immediate negotiation. This situation undermines trust between nations and jeopardizes future international collaborations. Ukraine’s steadfast refusal reveals a recognition of the inherent unfairness and the potentially devastating consequences of accepting such a deal. Their position deserves support and recognition. The narrative of an alleged debt to the US is simply a smokescreen for a power grab. Zelensky’s resolute stance showcases his leadership and commitment to his country. Ukraine deserves better than this. The focus should remain on defeating Russian aggression. Any agreement must prioritize Ukrainian sovereignty and long-term security.