By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite US assurances of Ukrainian involvement, a senior Ukrainian source confirms Kyiv received no invitation to US-Russia peace talks scheduled for Saudi Arabia. These talks, involving US envoys and potentially leading to further meetings, proceed without European participation, prompting a separate European summit in Paris. President Zelensky has firmly rejected any peace deal excluding Ukraine. Conflicting statements from US officials regarding Ukrainian involvement and the overall peace process have created uncertainty and concern.
Read the original article here
Ukraine’s exclusion from US-Russia peace talks in Saudi Arabia is, frankly, astounding. The very notion of negotiating a peace agreement for Ukraine without Ukraine’s presence is fundamentally flawed, a betrayal of basic principles of diplomacy and self-determination. It’s as if the victim of a crime isn’t allowed to participate in discussions about the punishment of the perpetrator. This isn’t about peace; it’s about power plays and potential backroom deals.
This situation evokes a deep sense of unease, reminiscent of historical blunders where appeasement paved the way for further aggression. The parallels with the Munich Agreement, where Czechoslovakia’s fate was decided without its participation, are chillingly clear. This blatant disregard for Ukraine’s sovereignty fuels fears of a repeat of past mistakes, a potential carve-up of Ukrainian territory under the guise of “peace.”
The lack of Ukrainian representation in these talks raises serious concerns about the motivations of the parties involved. It suggests a willingness to sacrifice Ukrainian interests to achieve some other, possibly self-serving, goal. Is this truly about peace, or is it about securing economic or political advantage for the US and Russia at Ukraine’s expense? The optics are undeniably awful, suggesting a prioritization of expediency over justice.
The potential outcomes are deeply disturbing. A deal forged without Ukrainian input could lead to the forced cession of territory, the abandonment of crucial infrastructure, and the continued suffering of the Ukrainian people. Such an agreement would likely be unstable and short-lived, potentially igniting further conflict. This isn’t merely about territory; it’s about the very integrity of the Ukrainian nation.
The perceived lack of American leadership in this situation is deeply worrying. The US, a staunch ally of Ukraine, has an obligation to support its partner, not to actively marginalize it in critical negotiations. The optics of this scenario are catastrophic, eroding the trust placed in American diplomacy and signaling a troubling shift in global power dynamics. Is this the America that will stand tall as a bastion of liberty and democracy?
This episode feels like a betrayal of the promises made to Ukraine, a country that has sacrificed so much in its fight for freedom and independence. The implication that Ukraine’s fate could be decided behind closed doors, without its voice being heard, is deeply unsettling. There is a palpable sense of moral and diplomatic bankruptcy within the proceedings; what should be a peace-making effort resembles a cynical power grab.
The long-term implications extend far beyond Ukraine. The precedent set by these talks could embolden aggressors worldwide, encouraging them to believe they can achieve territorial gains through pressure and intimidation rather than respecting international norms and principles of self-determination. It sends a chilling message: that a country’s sovereignty can be casually disregarded by powerful nations.
It’s easy to understand the outrage and frustration expressed by those who see this as a grave mistake. The situation demands a serious reassessment of the US approach to the conflict. It’s hard not to feel a profound disappointment in the potential abandonment of an ally, a country fighting for its very existence. The international community needs to step up and ensure that Ukraine’s voice is heard, its sovereignty protected, and its future secured—not predetermined in backroom deals. The lack of Ukrainian inclusion is simply unacceptable.