By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal proposed a unified European army leveraging Ukraine’s combat experience, particularly in drone technology. He highlighted Ukraine’s rapid drone production capabilities, exceeding one million FPV drones in 2024, as a key asset for bolstering European defenses. Shmyhal further suggested that Ukraine’s battle-hardened military could potentially replace a significant portion of the US military presence in Europe, strengthening transatlantic relations. This proposal, while building upon existing initiatives like PESCO, emphasizes Ukraine’s strategic value and its commitment to EU membership.
Read the original article here
Ukraine’s potential to replace US troops in Europe is a complex issue, sparking considerable debate. The idea itself stems from a growing distrust in the United States’ role as a global military power, fueled by perceptions of inconsistent foreign policy and a perceived abandonment of its traditional allies.
This lack of trust isn’t confined to Europe. Many Americans share these concerns, questioning the wisdom of maintaining a vast military presence worldwide while simultaneously championing an “America First” policy. This perceived contradiction weakens America’s global influence and raises questions about its reliability as a security partner.
The assertion that Ukraine could effectively fill the void left by US troop withdrawals needs careful examination. While Ukraine has proven itself a formidable fighting force, possessing exceptional combat experience and capabilities, it is not a direct equivalent. The US military’s presence offers a level of deterrence that goes beyond simple troop numbers. The potential for accidental engagement with US forces acts as a significant deterrent against any aggressive military action. Replacing US troops with Ukrainian soldiers, even on a one-to-one basis, wouldn’t replicate this crucial element of strategic deterrence.
The argument that a reduction of US military presence necessitates increased European military spending and capabilities has merit. Many Europeans are reluctant to engage in large-scale military conflicts, a sentiment that has been building for decades. The idea of replacing American troops with European ones raises immediate questions about the willingness and capacity of European nations to fulfill this role. This also points to a potential need for significant investment in European defense infrastructure and capabilities to handle potential threats effectively.
Furthermore, the suggestion that Ukraine might replace “Russian troops in Europe” in a worst-case scenario underscores the severity of the situation. If Ukraine were to lose the war, the consequences for the stability of Europe could be devastating, increasing the potential for aggression from Russia. This scenario highlights the importance of continued support for Ukraine and the need for a strong collective response to Russian aggression.
The discussion often turns to the role of nuclear weapons. Some suggest that a robust nuclear deterrent, possibly even increased nuclear capabilities within Europe, is necessary to maintain peace and security. However, the use of nuclear weapons introduces exceptionally high risks and has far-reaching consequences. Therefore, exploring this avenue must be handled with utmost caution and careful consideration of potential repercussions.
In the current geopolitical climate, the concept of Ukraine replacing US troops in Europe raises more questions than it answers. While Ukraine’s military prowess is undeniable, a simple substitution of forces fails to account for the strategic, political, and deterrent implications of US military presence. Ultimately, a solution requires a more nuanced approach, addressing concerns about the reliability of global powers, the need for enhanced European defense capabilities, and the ongoing threat posed by Russian aggression.
The discussion also highlights the limitations of solely relying on military solutions. A stronger emphasis on diplomatic efforts, international cooperation, and economic sanctions, coupled with a focus on strengthening global security frameworks, could prove as essential, if not more so, than the number of troops deployed. The potential for conflict remains high, and the path forward requires a multifaceted approach involving military preparedness, diplomatic engagement, and collaborative efforts to prevent further escalation.
The debate surrounding the potential replacement of US troops by Ukrainian forces in Europe highlights a changing geopolitical landscape, one marked by uncertainty, distrust, and the need for a reassessment of security strategies. Finding solutions that enhance European security while addressing the evolving nature of global power dynamics remains a significant challenge demanding careful consideration from all parties involved. The future stability of Europe hangs in the balance, requiring collaborative efforts from all stakeholders to navigate these complexities and secure lasting peace.