By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal proposes that Ukraine’s well-trained Armed Forces could form the foundation of a unified European army following potential EU membership. This proposal highlights Ukraine’s unique military experience and expertise gained during the ongoing conflict. Shmyhal also emphasizes Ukraine’s significant untapped natural resources, such as uranium, lithium, and titanium, which could benefit Europe and potentially replace Russian imports. However, recent US demands for access to these resources and the Trump administration’s push for immediate negotiations raise concerns about Ukraine’s future role in any peace process and the overall security landscape in Europe.
Read the original article here
Ukrainian prime minister says country’s military could form basis of a new EU army. This proposal is intriguing, especially considering the current geopolitical climate. The idea of leveraging Ukraine’s battle-hardened military to create a unified European force resonates with the urgent need for a stronger, independent European defense capability. The suggestion isn’t just about military might; it’s about filling a strategic void left by shifts in global power dynamics.
The proposal to use Ukraine’s military experience as the foundation for a new European army addresses the growing concern over Europe’s vulnerability. The war in Ukraine has starkly revealed existing weaknesses, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on NATO for security. A unified European army would offer a degree of self-reliance and would bolster the continent’s ability to respond to threats independently.
This proposal also speaks to the unique perspective and expertise Ukraine’s military possesses. Years of combat against a major power have given its forces invaluable experience in modern warfare. This practical knowledge would be a crucial asset in shaping and training a new pan-European army. The suggestion isn’t about simply transplanting Ukrainian soldiers, but rather transferring knowledge, tactics, and operational experience.
The economic potential of integrating Ukraine into the EU also plays a significant role. Ukraine’s untapped natural resources, from uranium to lithium and titanium, could substantially strengthen Europe’s economic independence. This is particularly significant considering the current reliance on Russia for some of these crucial materials. The idea is not just about replacing Russian resources but also about forging a more resilient and self-sufficient European economy.
The current geopolitical situation further underscores the need for a united European front. Rising authoritarianism globally, particularly the actions of Russia, Iran, and North Korea, creates an increasingly precarious environment. A stronger, independent European defense would act as a counterbalance to these threats, promoting stability and deterring aggression. The timing of this proposal couldn’t be more relevant.
However, the idea of a unified European army presents considerable challenges. The disparate cultures, histories, and political systems across Europe would need to be carefully navigated to build a truly cohesive force. Different priorities and differing levels of investment in defense capabilities would also need to be addressed. The integration of countries with varying levels of military experience and infrastructure would require extensive planning and resources.
Furthermore, the proposal highlights the need for a more proactive and united European approach to security. The current reliance on external actors, especially the United States, for security guarantees has proven problematic. This has been highlighted by recent events, suggesting the need for Europe to assume greater responsibility for its own defense. The proposal for a new army is a response to this, suggesting a potential shift towards greater European autonomy in security matters.
The economic aspect of this proposal is equally important. A unified Europe with access to Ukraine’s natural resources would be less dependent on external sources, bolstering its economic strength and resilience. This would be particularly important in the context of diversifying supply chains and reducing dependence on potentially unstable or hostile nations. This independence would benefit not only Ukraine but the entire European Union.
Despite the considerable challenges, the potential benefits of creating a unified European army based on Ukraine’s military experience are compelling. This proposal represents a bold response to the changing geopolitical landscape, suggesting that it may be time for Europe to take a more proactive role in its own defense. The creation of such a force would require overcoming many obstacles, but the potential rewards could be transformative for Europe’s security and economic independence.
The success of such an initiative would depend on resolving internal divisions within the EU, addressing potential concerns and hesitations from member states, and securing necessary resources and funding. However, the very existence of this proposal signals a growing understanding that Europe must take control of its future security and that Ukraine, with its formidable military and vast resources, could be a crucial partner in this endeavor. This is a significant development with potentially far-reaching consequences.