By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On February 20, 2025, Ukrainian Security Service units, in coordination with other defense forces, successfully struck the Novovelichkovskaya oil pumping station in Russia’s Krasnodar territory, a key facility supporting the Russian occupation forces. The station services the Tikhoretsk – Novorossiysk-2 pipeline. Russian forces responded with ground-based air defenses and helicopters. Further assessment of the strike’s effectiveness is underway, but future operations targeting similar strategic facilities are planned.
Read the original article here
The Ukrainian General Staff’s confirmation of a strike on an oil pumping station in Russia’s Krasnodar territory represents a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict. This targeted attack, focused on the Novovelichkovskaya facility supporting the Tikhoretsk–Novorossiysk-2 pipeline, highlights a strategic shift in Ukraine’s approach to the war. The operation, carried out on February 20th, involved the Security Service of Ukraine coordinating with other defense forces. This coordinated effort underscores a deliberate and planned assault, rather than a spontaneous act of aggression.
The strategic importance of the Novovelichkovskaya facility cannot be overstated. Its role in supplying fuel to Russian military forces makes it a prime target for disrupting the Kremlin’s war effort. By targeting this infrastructure, Ukraine aims to directly weaken Russia’s military capabilities, impacting its logistics and operational capacity on the battlefield. This calculated move demonstrates a growing understanding of the complexities of modern warfare and the importance of targeting supply chains as a key vulnerability.
Russia’s response to the attack involved deploying air defenses, including ground-based systems and Ka-52 helicopters. While the extent of the damage is still being assessed, the deployment of these defenses suggests that the strike had a noticeable impact and Russia considers this a serious threat to their war effort. The use of multiple layers of defense further highlights the significance of this target for the Russian military.
The Ukrainian General Staff’s statement signalling a continuation of such operations against infrastructure supporting Moscow’s war effort sends a clear message. This isn’t a one-off event, but rather a calculated strategy designed to continue to exert pressure on Russia. It represents a deliberate policy of targeting key logistical points to disrupt Russian operations and create further challenges for their military. This long-term strategy suggests a determination to continue pushing back against the invasion.
The attack fits into a broader pattern of Ukrainian actions aimed at disrupting Russian logistics and supply chains. The strategy is clearly focused on weakening the Kremlin’s military capacity by targeting their ability to supply their forces. By relentlessly attacking these crucial support networks, Ukraine continues its resistance even beyond direct combat engagement. This persistent pressure underscores the creativity and resourcefulness of the Ukrainian military.
Beyond the military implications, the strike raises several interesting points. The immediate aftermath, for example, raises questions about the fate of the workers at the oil pumping station. What will happen to them? Will they be involved in the clean-up? These are logistical concerns stemming from the direct consequences of military action.
Another interesting point is the independence of Ukraine’s actions. The assertion that Ukraine is not listening to the US, or indeed any external power, at this stage underscores the country’s determination to pursue its own strategy, prioritizing its own national interests and the end of the war on its own terms. The lack of US influence underscores the need for Ukraine to determine its own future.
Ultimately, the strike on the oil pumping station showcases a dynamic and evolving war, where strategic targeting of key infrastructure plays a crucial role. The confirmed strike, coupled with the Ukrainian General Staff’s statement regarding future actions, clearly signals a determined and resolute approach from Ukraine. The conflict is not simply confined to the battlefield; it now includes a broader strategic campaign aimed at disrupting the enemy’s supply lines and weakening their overall capacity. This represents a pivotal shift in the conflict, with lasting implications for both sides.