By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a US-Russia meeting in Riyadh, Ukraine expressed strong disapproval, with President Zelenskyy rejecting any Russian ultimatums and postponing a planned visit to Saudi Arabia. The talks, occurring amidst a fresh Russian drone attack on Ukraine, prompted accusations that decisions regarding Ukraine were made without its input. Kyiv voiced concerns that the discussions were improperly prepared and amounted to a forum for further Russian demands, fearing a repeat of past agreements violated by Russia. Ukraine emphasized its commitment to regaining all occupied territories and dismissed the possibility of compromise.
Read the original article here
Ukraine officials are deeply concerned about the ongoing US-led talks in Riyadh, viewing them as a form of appeasement towards Russia. The sheer audacity of negotiating with Russia, given the thousands of Ukrainian children kidnapped by the Russian forces, is seen as unconscionable. This isn’t just a diplomatic misstep; it’s a betrayal of fundamental principles.
The perception of the US engaging in negotiations from a position of weakness is fueling widespread outrage. The notion that the US is caving in to Russian demands is a bitter pill to swallow, particularly given the horrific consequences of the ongoing conflict. This perceived weakness is not only damaging the US’s international standing but is also interpreted as a tacit endorsement of Russia’s actions.
This situation evokes uncomfortable historical parallels, with many drawing comparisons to Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler. The fear is that history is repeating itself, with the US unwittingly emboldening Russia through its diplomatic efforts. The current trajectory is seen as a grave error with potentially catastrophic consequences.
The criticism extends beyond just the strategic implications. Many believe the US is actively undermining its own interests and those of its allies by failing to hold Russia accountable for its actions. The lack of firm action is interpreted as a sign of weakness and is fueling concerns about a broader erosion of American influence and credibility on the world stage.
There’s also a strong sense that the US is jeopardizing its own future by compromising with a regime known for its brutality and aggression. Some even go so far as to say the US is surrendering to Russia, not just in Ukraine but also in the broader geopolitical landscape. The current administration’s policies are seen as paving the way for a much more dangerous future.
The suspicion that this perceived appeasement is linked to political manipulation within the US is widely discussed. The belief that Russia has successfully cultivated influence within the US political system, and that this is directly contributing to the current situation, is fueling widespread distrust and anger. The fear is that the US is being used as a tool to advance Russia’s agenda.
The lack of Ukrainian involvement in these high-stakes discussions is a significant point of contention. The feeling is that a conflict this serious, involving the very sovereignty of Ukraine, demands that Ukrainian voices be at the center of any peace talks. The current structure, with Ukraine on the sidelines, is interpreted as yet another sign of disregard for their plight.
Beyond Ukraine, the broader international community is expressing concern about the US’s actions. The perception of American weakness is causing other nations to question the reliability of the US as an ally. This is leading to a reassessment of geopolitical alliances and potentially destabilizing the global order. The resulting uncertainty breeds fear and mistrust.
The potential for a wider conflict is also a significant point of anxiety. Many fear that the US’s perceived appeasement will only embolden Russia, leading to further aggression and potentially escalating the conflict into a global war. This concern is particularly heightened given the backdrop of existing geopolitical tensions and global instability.
In conclusion, the view from Ukraine and its supporters is stark. The US-led talks in Riyadh are not seen as a peaceful resolution; they are seen as a capitulation to Russian aggression, a dangerous precedent that jeopardizes not only Ukraine but also the broader international order. The concerns raised are profound and deserve serious consideration, given the potential consequences.