By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. voted against a UN resolution condemning the aggression, instead proposing a weaker alternative that omitted any mention of Russian culpability. This action, aligning the U.S. with Russia and against most European allies, marks a significant departure from past U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. resolution, calling only for an end to the conflict, was passed alongside the Ukrainian resolution, which garnered 93 votes in favor. This stark contrast highlights a deeply troubling and arguably dishonest shift in the U.S. stance on the conflict.
Read the original article here
The sellout of Ukraine represents a profound betrayal of a nation fighting for its survival, and arguably one of the most disgraceful episodes in recent US foreign policy. It’s a stark illustration of how a nation’s supposed strength can be undermined by a craven pursuit of personal gain or ideological alignment with hostile powers.
This alleged abandonment is not merely a matter of shifting geopolitical alliances; it signifies a breathtaking abdication of moral responsibility. The image of a wounded nation being robbed while struggling for its life is the most apt metaphor. The supposed guardians of global order have instead become opportunistic thieves, preying on the vulnerable.
It is deeply embarrassing to witness a nation claiming the mantle of global leadership acting with such craven self-interest. The narrative of a wealthy, powerful nation extorting money from a war-torn ally is not one that inspires confidence or respect. It fuels perceptions of weakness, desperation, and a blatant disregard for international norms.
The supposed motivations behind this action—be it financial greed or political expediency—are equally reprehensible. To suggest that aid provided to Ukraine is merely a “loan” that needs to be repaid is absurd. Ukraine’s sacrifice in relinquishing its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees should render such a proposition unconscionable. This isn’t a simple commercial transaction; it’s a matter of national security and the defense of democratic values.
The alleged actions are not only morally grotesque but also strategically short-sighted. Emboldening a hostile power like Russia through such calculated appeasement sets a dangerous precedent, jeopardizing the security of other allies and potentially destabilizing the entire international order. This perceived appeasement could embolden other aggressors, leading to future conflicts.
The shift in American foreign policy is particularly jarring given the nation’s historical role as a champion of democracy and freedom. This narrative of America as a shining city on a hill appears to have been replaced by a cynical, self-serving approach that prioritizes expediency over principle. The image projected is one of an empire not upholding its responsibilities but rather its own ruthless self-interest.
The implications extend far beyond Ukraine. Allies worldwide are now questioning America’s reliability and commitment to its partnerships. The implications of this are vast and potentially devastating. This distrust could severely weaken existing alliances and hamper future cooperative efforts. There’s a palpable fear among nations wondering if the United States will abandon them as well, leaving them vulnerable to hostile powers.
The argument that this is merely one in a long list of questionable US foreign policy decisions is not a defense but a further indictment. From the betrayals of allies in the Middle East to interventions in Latin America, the history is replete with instances where American foreign policy has fallen short of its ideals. However, this situation arguably stands out due to its blatant disregard for a close ally’s life-or-death struggle.
The damage done to America’s reputation is immense and far-reaching. This betrayal of Ukraine is more than a single incident; it is a symbolic representation of the decay of American moral authority. This is an image that will be difficult to erase from the minds of the international community, potentially harming US influence and diplomatic efforts for decades to come.
The consequences of this alleged betrayal could be long-lasting and far-reaching, potentially undermining the global order and fueling instability. The international community rightly has questions regarding the true motives of the leadership, casting doubts on the reliability of the U.S. as a global partner and weakening alliances. It is an unprecedented low point in American foreign policy, demanding a serious re-evaluation of priorities and a commitment to restoring trust. There are lingering questions over what exactly occurred behind closed doors and the depth of compromise.
Ultimately, the sellout of Ukraine is not just one of the most disgraceful US foreign policy episodes in decades; it is a potential turning point in global affairs, setting a dangerous precedent and weakening the very foundations of international cooperation. The longer-term implications of this alleged action remain to be seen, but the immediate damage to America’s image and its relationships with its allies is undeniable.