By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Trump’s recent actions demonstrate a pattern of installing loyalists, regardless of qualifications, into key positions within the Justice Department, intelligence services, and the military. This includes appointments such as Pam Bondi as Attorney General, Tulsi Gabbard in intelligence, and Kash Patel in multiple roles, effectively granting Trump direct control over these agencies. The Friday military purge, culminating in the appointment of John Dan Caine as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, further solidified this pattern. These moves, while seemingly contradictory, simultaneously serve to troll political opponents and advance a potential consolidation of power. The overall effect is a concerning concentration of power in the hands of the President.
Read the original article here
Trump Wants to Be President for Life—and He’s Already Preparing for It
Trump’s ambition to remain president for life is a chilling prospect, fueling widespread anxiety and speculation. The sheer audacity of such a desire, coupled with his past actions and rhetoric, paints a concerning picture of potential constitutional upheaval.
This isn’t merely idle speculation; a pattern of behavior suggests a concerted effort to consolidate power and circumvent democratic processes. The dismissal of key officials, the promotion of loyalists, and the persistent undermining of established institutions all point towards a calculated strategy to entrench his influence.
Many express a grim hope that his tenure will be cut short by natural causes, reflecting a deep-seated fear of what he might accomplish if allowed to remain in power indefinitely. Such sentiments highlight the desperation some feel about a potential loss of democratic governance.
The concern extends beyond Trump himself. His family, particularly his children, are perceived as potential successors, maintaining the Trumpist ideology and power structure long after he’s gone. This creates a dynasty-like scenario that would further solidify his legacy and thwart any attempts at meaningful change.
The possibility of Trump manipulating election processes to favor his party or successors adds another layer of concern. The belief that he would attempt to make it impossible for anyone outside the MAGA movement to win future elections is alarming, hinting at a potential shift away from fair and competitive elections.
While many hope for a swift end to his time in office, perhaps through natural means, the fear remains that his influence will persist even after his death. The enduring nature of his ideology, and the potential for a replacement from within the same movement, poses a considerable threat to American democracy.
The notion that Trump might invoke a national emergency to suspend elections, leveraging a fabricated pretext, further underscores this concern. This highlights a pattern of deploying falsehoods and exploiting loopholes to achieve power.
His poor health, frequently commented upon given his age and diet, fuels a sliver of hope that his ambitions might be curtailed naturally. However, this hope is tinged with the understanding that his health is no guarantee against further damage done during his time in office.
The idea that Trump’s political allies may have even considered extreme measures to maintain his power is deeply disturbing. The mere suggestion of potential assassination attempts for the sake of a political ideology underscores the gravity of the situation.
Furthermore, the widespread belief that Trump’s ultimate goal is not necessarily to remain president for life in the literal sense, but to avoid jail time, suggests a focus on self-preservation that could still wreak havoc on democratic processes. His actions may be a calculated effort to establish a legacy that could not be undone, irrespective of his personal fate.
The deep division within the United States, as evidenced by the varied reactions to Trump, is a significant factor. The fact that many Americans still support him, despite his actions, underscores how vulnerable democracy is to manipulation and the spread of misinformation.
The sheer scale of the potential ramifications, including a possible civil war should American democracy truly crumble, demonstrates the profound implications of Trump’s actions. This isn’t a partisan issue; the potential consequences transcend party lines, threatening the very foundations of American society.
In conclusion, Trump’s desire to remain in power, whether through direct means or by installing a successor, is a serious threat to American democracy. While many hope for a swift resolution, the underlying concern is that his lasting influence could outlive his presidency, requiring vigilant and persistent opposition to mitigate his enduring impact.