By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Readers are encouraged to submit tips to The Daily Beast. Submissions can be made through a designated online portal. The publication welcomes information from all sources. Further details regarding submission guidelines are not provided in this brief.
Read the original article here
Trump Signs New Order to Vastly Expand His Presidential Powers
Trump has signed a new executive order that seeks to significantly expand the powers of the presidency, causing widespread alarm and sparking intense debate. The order aims to place White House control over numerous independent federal agencies, effectively ending their operational independence. This unprecedented power grab has been met with strong criticism from those who view it as a direct assault on the foundational principles of American democracy.
This executive order directly challenges the established system of checks and balances, a cornerstone of the U.S. government. By centralizing control over agencies like the FCC, FTC, and SEC, the order concentrates immense power within the executive branch, potentially enabling the president to influence or even manipulate vital aspects of American life, from elections and media to the economy and the environment. The move is rooted in the controversial “unitary executive theory,” which argues for the president’s sole authority over the executive branch. Opponents argue this theory is a dangerous distortion of the constitutional principle of separation of powers, effectively granting the president unchecked authority.
The order’s mechanism involves granting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) sweeping supervisory powers over these independent agencies. This empowers the OMB, under its current leadership, to dictate agency policies, control funding, and enforce compliance with presidential priorities. The implications are far-reaching, allowing the president to effectively reward loyal agencies with funding and punish those deemed disloyal through budget cuts, thereby undermining their ability to function independently. This undermines decades of established norms designed to ensure impartiality and prevent political interference in critical areas of governance.
Legal scholars universally predict that the order will face intense legal challenges. The action is a clear violation of the principle of separation of powers, a foundational element of the American constitutional system designed to prevent tyranny and ensure accountability. The order effectively grants the president the authority to rewrite laws and regulations without legislative approval, eroding the traditional role of Congress in setting policy. The courts will be forced to decide whether the president can unilaterally seize this level of authority. This presents the Supreme Court with a monumental test of its ability to uphold the constitution against executive overreach.
The timing of this order is also concerning. It comes at a time when trust in institutions is already fragile, and the order itself could further erode public confidence in government. This action is not just an expansion of executive authority, but a blatant disregard for the democratic processes that underpin American society. The order appears to aim to establish a system where the president’s will reigns supreme, unfettered by legislative or judicial oversight.
The lack of bipartisan condemnation is equally unsettling. Many predict that the order will embolden the president to take further steps toward consolidating power, potentially leading to even more significant challenges to democratic norms and institutions. The potential for abuse is immense, particularly regarding elections, media, and economic regulation. The order places the president in a position to favor allies while punishing opponents through regulatory action.
The order’s potential implications extend beyond the realm of domestic policy. The president’s move signals a shift in the international perception of the United States, possibly undermining the country’s global standing and its ability to engage in effective diplomacy. The implications for international cooperation and stability remain uncertain, but this power grab has implications far beyond the United States itself.
In conclusion, the executive order represents a profound threat to the integrity of American democracy. The sheer scope of its intended power grab is unprecedented, and its implications for the future of American governance remain deeply troubling. It remains to be seen whether the judiciary and the American public will rise to the occasion and challenge this attempt to dismantle established checks and balances and fundamentally alter the American political system. The situation demands immediate and decisive action to prevent a further erosion of democratic norms and institutions.