By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers significantly increased water releases from Terminus and Schafer Dams in Tulare County, California, a move spurred by an executive order seemingly linked to President Trump’s pronouncements. These releases, totaling billions of gallons, were made without typical coordination with state and local officials, causing concern among water managers and farmers who rely on these reservoirs for irrigation. The timing, during winter with low demand and minimal snowpack, and lack of a clear water transportation plan, have drawn sharp criticism and questions regarding the decision-making process and potential negative impacts on agriculture and communities. State officials have emphasized the lack of consultation and the current absence of a need for the released water.
Read the original article here
Acting on Trump’s order, federal officials opened up two California dams, Terminus and Success Dams, situated in the Central Valley, releasing significant amounts of water. This action has drawn widespread criticism, particularly given the already dry conditions in the region following a meager winter. Experts point out that releasing water at this time of year is counterintuitive, as reservoirs should be filled during the rainy season to ensure sufficient water supplies for agriculture and urban areas throughout the summer months. This decision is deemed particularly egregious considering decades of careful water management coordination between local, state, and federal agencies has been unilaterally disregarded.
The timing of the release is baffling, as farmers depend on this water for summer irrigation. The resulting water shortage will severely impact agricultural production in the Central Valley, potentially leading to significant economic losses and threatening the livelihoods of farmers, many of whom are Republicans. This is expected to result in substantial political fallout, with blame likely falling on Democrats despite the clear federal directive responsible for the water release.
The released water is unlikely to benefit Southern California, as its flow path will carry it to the San Joaquin River and ultimately into the Pacific Ocean. Los Angeles’ reservoirs are already near record levels for this time of year and have no capacity for additional water. Therefore, the purported justification of assisting wildfire efforts, seemingly used to cover the real reasons, is completely unfounded.
The situation is compounded by the near-empty state of the reservoirs themselves; at a mere 20% capacity, releasing additional water only exacerbates the existing water scarcity. It’s described as a reckless act of environmental vandalism that actively undermines California’s water security. Some even suggest a malicious intent behind the order, speculating on a potential motive of revenge against California or a deliberate attempt to undermine the state’s infrastructure and economy.
The implications are far-reaching. Besides the immediate impact on farmers and the potential for increased food prices, the lack of water will also affect countless other individuals and communities. The poorest will likely bear the brunt of the ensuing hardship. The accusations range from simple incompetence to a calculated act of sabotage, with many suggesting the president’s actions show a concerning disregard for the well-being of the population and a total lack of comprehension on the subject of water management.
The incident is raising serious questions about accountability and the potential for presidential overreach. Critics argue that federal officials should have refused to follow an order that is demonstrably harmful and nonsensical. The lack of transparency surrounding the decision-making process and the lack of consultation with local officials and irrigation districts further fuel the anger and concern. The situation highlights a dangerous lack of checks and balances within the system, allowing a single individual to inflict widespread damage with seemingly no consequences.
Many believe that this event highlights a deeper issue – the susceptibility of crucial infrastructure to political maneuvering, suggesting a severe undermining of established water management protocols. The whole situation is described as an avoidable disaster. The lack of a clear, reasonable explanation for the water release only underscores the potential for a political agenda that prioritizes retribution over sensible resource management. The ongoing consequences are expected to be severe and long-lasting, impacting not only the agricultural sector but also the social and economic fabric of California. The coming summer is anticipated to expose the full extent of this misguided action, and the resulting blame game is expected to be highly contentious.