By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Peter Marocco, a former State Department official, secretly met with sanctioned Bosnian Serb separatist leaders during a 2018 Balkans trip, defying U.S. policy and undermining peace efforts. Subsequently, during his tenure at USAID under the Trump administration, he attempted to drastically alter the agency’s focus, prioritizing a militaristic and Christian nationalist agenda, leading to internal complaints and curtailed duties. Now, in a powerful position within the State Department, Marocco is orchestrating a widespread dismantling of the American foreign aid system, facing legal challenges for his actions. This current campaign is viewed by many as both retribution against past opponents and an opportunity to implement his controversial policies.
Read the original article here
A former Trump administration official, Peter Marocco, now serving as the director for foreign assistance at the State Department, is at the center of a controversy. He’s effectively shaping the Trump administration’s foreign aid policy single-handedly, according to experts. This raises concerns, particularly given his actions in 2018.
During a diplomatic trip that year, Marocco secretly met with ethnonationalist Bosnian Serb separatist leaders. These leaders actively worked to undermine a U.S.-backed peace agreement, aiming to establish a Christian Bosnian Serb state.
Among those he met was Milorad Dodik, who, at the time, was under U.S. sanctions for obstructing American efforts to prevent further bloodshed in the region. This clandestine meeting directly contradicts U.S. policy and raises serious questions about Marocco’s loyalty and judgment.
The secrecy surrounding the meeting itself is alarming. The lack of transparency and the failure to respond to inquiries about the meeting’s purpose and Marocco’s views only deepen the concerns. This secrecy suggests an intentional effort to circumvent established diplomatic protocols and oversight.
The implications of Marocco’s actions extend beyond this single incident. His alignment with ethnonationalist leaders who actively work against U.S. interests raises questions about broader policy shifts under the Trump administration. This raises concerns about the direction of U.S. foreign aid and its potential to support agendas that directly oppose American values and interests.
This situation seems to signal a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, moving away from supporting peace and stability in the Balkans towards aligning with groups that actively destabilize the region. This is particularly troubling given the historical context of the Bosnian conflict and the ongoing efforts towards peace and reconciliation.
The deliberate undermining of a U.S.-backed peace agreement by a high-ranking official is a serious offense, potentially jeopardizing years of progress and investment in peacebuilding efforts. The repercussions of this action could be far-reaching and long-lasting, potentially reigniting conflict and undermining regional stability.
Furthermore, the connection between Marocco’s actions and the broader rise of Christian nationalism within the Trump administration is a cause for deep concern. The apparent prioritization of religious agendas over established foreign policy goals raises questions about the integrity and neutrality of U.S. foreign aid programs.
There’s also the question of whether this event is an isolated incident or part of a wider pattern of actions by the administration aimed at undermining international cooperation and promoting divisive ideologies. The lack of accountability and transparency surrounding this matter further fuels these concerns.
The silence from Marocco and the State Department in response to inquiries about this meeting further exacerbates the situation. This lack of accountability and transparency raises serious questions about the administration’s commitment to upholding established procedures and adhering to U.S. foreign policy principles.
The situation demands thorough investigation and accountability. Allowing such actions to go unaddressed sets a dangerous precedent, potentially emboldening similar actions by other officials and further eroding public trust in the integrity of U.S. foreign policy.
The potential impact of Marocco’s actions on the current political climate in the Balkans is also deeply troubling. The meeting could embolden separatist movements and undermine the efforts of those working towards peace and democracy in the region, particularly given the ongoing challenges faced by Serbian citizens seeking democratic reforms.
In conclusion, Peter Marocco’s secret meeting with ethnonationalist leaders in defiance of U.S. policy represents a serious breach of trust and a significant threat to U.S. foreign policy objectives. The lack of transparency and accountability surrounding this incident demands a thorough investigation and appropriate action to prevent similar occurrences in the future. The broader implications for U.S. foreign policy and the stability of the Balkans are significant and warrant serious attention.