By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump and Elon Musk are falsely claiming millions of deceased individuals are receiving Social Security benefits to justify drastic cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. These cuts, aiming for over $1 trillion in savings, would fund massive tax cuts for the wealthy, despite previous promises not to touch these programs. This assertion, amplified by figures like Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, ignores the fact that less than 1 percent of Social Security benefits are improperly paid, according to a recent report. Republican budget proposals, aligned with Trump’s plan, would exacerbate the issue with significant cuts to essential programs.
Read the original article here
A former Trump administration official recently declared Social Security “wrong,” setting the stage for potential drastic cuts to the program. This assertion, coupled with the administration’s apparent intention to significantly reduce spending, raises serious concerns about the future of this crucial social safety net.
The suggestion that Social Security is inherently flawed is deeply troubling. For decades, Americans have diligently contributed a portion of their earnings to this system, expecting a measure of financial security in their retirement years. To dismiss this system as inherently “wrong” disregards the contributions and expectations of millions.
The proposed cuts are particularly alarming given the ongoing economic challenges facing many Americans. Inflation is rampant, healthcare costs are soaring, and the cost of living continues to rise. Many families are already struggling to make ends meet, and eliminating a vital source of retirement income would undoubtedly exacerbate these difficulties, potentially pushing many seniors into poverty.
The claim that substantial savings can be achieved through eliminating “tax scams” is misleading at best. Social Security is not a tax; it’s a social insurance program funded by employee and employer contributions. Suggesting that fraud and waste alone justify such massive cuts ignores the fundamental nature of the program and the needs it serves.
The proposed budget balancing strategy also appears unrealistic. The goal of balancing the budget by raising a trillion dollars in revenue while cutting a trillion dollars in spending is predicated on the assumption that substantial savings can be found within Social Security and similar programs, without significantly affecting the beneficiaries. This seems unlikely given the sheer number of individuals relying on these programs.
Further adding to the concern is the disregard for the long-term impacts of these cuts. Millions of Americans depend on Social Security for their survival. Eliminating or significantly reducing benefits would create widespread hardship and suffering, disproportionately impacting vulnerable populations such as the elderly and disabled. The potential human cost of these cuts is simply unacceptable.
The proposed changes are not only financially questionable but morally repugnant. The suggestion that those who have contributed to Social Security for decades should simply “pull themselves up by their bootstraps” ignores the realities of aging, illness, and economic hardship. Many individuals simply cannot afford to work well into their old age, especially considering the prevalence of ageism and declining physical capabilities.
Even beyond the financial implications, there’s a question of trust. The very foundation of Social Security is the promise of support in later life. Breaching this promise would severely erode public trust in the government and its ability to fulfill its commitments to the people. This lack of trust could have far-reaching consequences for the stability and legitimacy of the government.
Ultimately, the claim that Social Security is “wrong” and the subsequent push for massive cuts betray a fundamental misunderstanding of the program’s vital role in American society. It’s a social insurance system built on the principle of collective responsibility, a principle that seems to be disregarded in this pursuit of budget balancing. The potential ramifications of these proposed cuts are far too significant to ignore; they represent a fundamental shift in the social contract, leaving millions vulnerable and uncertain about their future.