The Trump administration and Elon Musk falsely claimed millions of deceased centenarians are receiving Social Security benefits, a figure significantly inflating the actual problem of improper payments. While improper payments, including some to deceased individuals, exist, the majority of erroneous payments were overpayments to the living, totaling less than 1% of total benefits. The inflated figures stem from outdated software and incomplete death records, not widespread fraud involving impossibly aged recipients. The administration’s focus on this issue distracts from more substantial areas of government financial waste.

Read the original article here

Tens of millions of dead people aren’t receiving Social Security checks, despite claims to the contrary. The notion that such a massive fraud is occurring is simply not supported by reality. If tens of millions of deceased individuals were receiving benefits, the financial impact would be immediately obvious, and we’d all be feeling the effects.

The suggestion that the Social Security Administration (SSA) is failing to identify and stop payments to deceased individuals is inaccurate. While there have been reports of the SSA’s database having incomplete death information, especially for older records, this doesn’t mean those individuals were receiving benefits. The SSA actively works to identify deceased beneficiaries and stop payments. They regularly send letters requesting confirmation of life from individuals and employ methods to prevent fraudulent payments.

The claims often cite issues like missing birth dates in the SSA’s older systems—systems, incidentally, which default to an old date, resulting in impossibly high ages, leading to misleading interpretations. These legacy systems are being updated, but the fact that a system displays an inaccurate age does not automatically mean that a deceased individual is receiving payments. The actual processing of benefit payments is separate and involves many safeguards.

The idea that “tens of millions” are receiving fraudulent checks is a gross exaggeration. While fraud undoubtedly exists in any large system, the scale being claimed is unrealistic. The mechanisms in place to detect and prevent fraudulent payments are far more effective than suggested. A claim of this magnitude would require substantial evidence, which is conspicuously absent.

Furthermore, the assertion that this somehow reflects a lack of understanding of coding is simplistic and inaccurate. The complex task of managing a massive database like the SSA’s requires far more than basic programming skills. The process involves complex algorithms, data validation, and various security protocols designed to prevent fraud. These systems are regularly audited and updated, constantly working to refine their accuracy and efficiency.

The frequent mentions of these claims coming from specific public figures should be viewed with a degree of skepticism. It’s crucial to differentiate between claims and facts. The assertions lack factual basis, and their repetition does not make them true. The sources of these assertions have a history of making unsubstantiated claims. The spread of such misinformation is fueled by social media, creating a cycle of disinformation.

The suggestion that this is a deliberate tactic to justify cutting Social Security benefits is a cynical yet plausible concern. It’s important to consider that such claims could be used as a pretext to dismantle vital social programs. It is essential to separate truthful criticisms of systems with flaws from deliberate misrepresentations used to promote a particular agenda.

The possibility of future cuts to Social Security should be viewed seriously and debated thoughtfully. The claims of widespread fraud should not be used to justify such cuts. These should be approached with a factual basis and transparent discourse, without the use of misleading statistics or unsubstantiated allegations.

In conclusion, the claim that tens of millions of deceased individuals are receiving Social Security payments is demonstrably false. While improving the accuracy of the SSA’s database is an ongoing process, the system in place actively works to prevent and detect fraud. The persistence of this falsehood highlights the dangers of misinformation and the need for critical thinking in evaluating such claims. The focus should remain on ensuring the integrity and continued sustainability of the Social Security system for those who depend on it, rather than allowing unfounded accusations to undermine its essential function.