By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Prime Minister Trudeau warned that new U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, potentially reaching 50 percent, will result in American job losses, mirroring the 75,000 jobs lost during similar 2018 tariffs. Canada will retaliate against these measures, escalating a trade war. Trudeau emphasized that Ottawa will advocate against these tariffs, highlighting the detrimental impact on both countries. Despite President Trump’s suggestion of annexation, Trudeau firmly stated that Canada will not become the 51st U.S. state.
Read the original article here
The imposition of tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, regardless of their magnitude, will inevitably lead to job losses in the United States. This is because even if the intention is to bolster domestic steel production, the US simply lacks the capacity to meet demand in the short term. This shortfall will inevitably lead to shortages, thus exacerbating existing inflationary pressures and impacting consumers significantly.
The belief that tariffs will magically resurrect US manufacturing jobs is misguided. Big businesses will always seek the cheapest labor markets, meaning the jobs simply won’t return to the US. Historically, manufacturing jobs have shifted from China to India and Southeast Asia, and the next likely destination is Africa. This trend isn’t likely to change, and tariffs only mask the underlying economic realities.
The economic consequences of these tariffs extend beyond steel production. The increased cost of steel will affect various sectors, including the oil and gas industry, which relies heavily on steel for extraction and transportation. This will further impact the price of fuel, causing cascading economic effects that will ripple through many sectors and further increase the cost of goods and services.
Furthermore, the global demand for steel is currently high, partly driven by large-scale infrastructure projects like Saudi Arabia’s “The Line” project, which consumes a substantial portion of the world’s steel output annually. Therefore, artificially inflating domestic steel prices through tariffs only makes the US less competitive in the global market and hurts its consumers who will pay higher prices for everything from cars to infrastructure projects. It makes no economic sense to reduce supply at a time of increased global demand.
The lack of readily available bauxite, a crucial component for aluminum production, further complicates the situation. With major bauxite producers involved in trade disputes, the US faces significant constraints in ramping up domestic aluminum production. This underscores the inherent complexities and challenges of such protectionist measures. The short-sightedness is remarkable; these decisions affect a vast interconnected web of industries and global trade relations.
The attempt to protect inefficient industries through tariffs is unsustainable in the long term. Tariffs won’t bring back jobs; they simply shift costs onto consumers and businesses, ultimately causing widespread economic harm. The focus on domestic production ignores the fact that globalized production has already drastically altered how goods are manufactured and distributed.
Beyond the immediate economic impact, there’s a broader political concern. The imposition of tariffs can damage international relations, straining alliances and creating uncertainty in the global trading system. The argument that this is a necessary move for national security is flimsy at best. It’s not a sustainable long-term strategy.
The notion that the tariffs will only affect Canadian producers is flawed. While Canada will indeed feel the effects, US businesses will ultimately bear the brunt of the increased prices. This will reduce competitiveness and could result in reduced orders from US businesses to Canadian producers, hurting both countries’ economies. Switching business partners is not a simple task; it’s a complex and time-consuming process involving established relationships, logistical considerations, and quality control.
Moreover, the overall goal of these policies remains unclear. The assertion that they are designed to create resentment and desperation in the population to justify border expansions is troubling. Such a cynical calculation ignores the profound human consequences of economic hardship. The focus should be on creating sustainable economic policies that benefit all citizens, not on dividing and manipulating the population.
Ultimately, the imposition of tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum is a short-sighted and ultimately self-defeating strategy. The US will experience job losses and higher consumer prices regardless of the tariff levels, while damaging its international relationships. A more strategic and sustainable approach is necessary to address the challenges facing the US economy and its manufacturing sector.