By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Kremlin’s information campaign, highlighted by the Ukrainian HUR, centers on narratives of Western betrayal and Ukrainian government illegitimacy, echoed recently by some in the U.S. Russia aims to declare victory by February 24, 2025, potentially framing this as a triumph over NATO. This campaign also seeks to discredit Ukraine’s European partners, particularly those supporting Ukraine with substantial military aid, by labeling them “enemies of peace.” American aid to Ukraine is a key target of this disinformation effort.
Read the original article here
Russia’s planned declaration of “victory” on February 24th, the anniversary of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, is a calculated move designed to sow discord and uncertainty. Ukrainian intelligence suggests this announcement aims to portray Ukraine as abandoned by the West and its government as illegitimate, thereby undermining international support.
This narrative push will likely emphasize a supposed NATO defeat and blame European leaders for obstructing peace. The timing is no accident; it leverages the shifting landscape of US foreign policy, particularly the rise of voices questioning continued support for Ukraine.
The Kremlin hopes to capitalize on this uncertainty, especially with comments from individuals like Donald Trump criticizing President Zelenskyy and accusing him of manipulating America for military aid. This fuels the narrative that Ukraine’s allies are unreliable, weakening their resolve in the face of the ongoing conflict.
The planned declaration attempts to mask the reality on the ground, where Ukrainian and allied forces continue to actively resist Russian aggression. This propaganda campaign isn’t solely focused on the battlefield; it’s a significant information warfare operation aimed at eroding morale and support for Ukraine’s resistance.
Despite Russia’s attempts to paint a picture of triumph, the ongoing conflict and continued resistance from Ukraine demonstrate a very different reality. The declaration is essentially an attempt to spin a narrative of victory out of a war that continues to cost Russia dearly.
The sheer audacity of this planned announcement is striking, highlighting the disconnect between the Kremlin’s perception of the conflict and the on-the-ground reality. It suggests a desperate attempt to salvage some semblance of success from a costly and largely unsuccessful invasion.
The planned announcement is not just a matter of spin; it’s a strategic maneuver. Russia aims to create doubt within the international community and to weaken the resolve of Ukraine’s allies by implying that continued support is futile.
It’s crucial to remember that the ongoing conflict has deep implications that extend far beyond Ukraine’s borders. The narrative that Russia intends to present is a significant component of this, potentially shaping global opinions and perceptions of the war in a way that benefits the Russian narrative.
This planned declaration underscores the importance of continued international support for Ukraine. While the Kremlin seeks to portray a picture of victory, the reality on the ground suggests a far more complex situation. Countering Russia’s disinformation campaign is crucial to maintaining international support for Ukraine’s resistance.
While Russia might declare victory, the reality of the situation will likely remain unchanged. The planned declaration might provide temporary propaganda success, but it is unlikely to fundamentally alter the ongoing conflict or the underlying geopolitical dynamics. Ultimately, the true measure of victory will be decided on the battlefield and in the continued support of Ukraine’s allies.
The timing of this carefully orchestrated announcement coincides with the anniversary of the invasion, lending symbolic weight to the declaration. However, this symbolic gesture cannot mask the ongoing military reality and the continued need for continued support for Ukraine.
The overall effect of the planned announcement is likely to be limited due to the readily available evidence that contradicts Russia’s claims. The continued resistance of Ukraine and the ongoing international support suggest the declaration will be viewed with skepticism. Nonetheless, the potential for destabilization and the spread of disinformation cannot be ignored.
Ultimately, the success or failure of Russia’s propaganda campaign will depend on the response of the international community. Continued international support for Ukraine, combined with robust efforts to counter Russian disinformation, will be crucial in mitigating the impact of the planned declaration. The “victory” declared on February 24th will likely remain a contested narrative, highlighting the complexities of information warfare in the context of a protracted armed conflict.