By John Q. Hosedrinker 
January 2025 marked Russia’s second-highest monthly personnel loss, with approximately 48,240 casualties, closely trailing December 2024’s record. This represents a daily average loss exceeding 1,500 personnel. UK Defence Intelligence projects continued high casualty rates, averaging over 1,000 daily losses in February, attributed to the intensity of Russian operations. Cumulative losses since the war’s beginning are estimated to surpass 50,000 for the year and 837,000 overall.
Read the original article here
January was Russia’s worst month for troop losses since December 2024, according to UK intelligence assessments. This represents a staggering level of casualties, even when considering the brutal losses suffered in the preceding months. It’s crucial to remember, however, that this doesn’t automatically translate into a complete collapse of the Russian military effort.
The sheer scale of these losses raises the question of how Russia can continue its advance, however slow, in the face of such attrition. The answer likely lies in a combination of factors, including the massive size of the Russian military and their seemingly boundless capacity to replenish their ranks with new, less experienced soldiers. The continued influx of poorly trained replacements might explain why, despite heavy losses, the Russian advance, while slow, persists.
These figures, however, are subject to interpretation. While UK intelligence places January as having the second-highest losses after December, some sources suggest a less severe picture. One interpretation points to the fact that official death counts often lag, meaning January’s casualties might be underreported, with numbers expected to rise as official reporting catches up. There are also different ways to tally up casualties. Focusing solely on reported deaths from obituaries, for example, overlooks the significant numbers of wounded soldiers, and misses completely those reported as missing in action.
Different datasets paint different pictures. Data collected from Russian obituaries suggests a ranking of December 2024 as the worst month, followed by November, October, and then January 2025. However, this data is inherently limited, as not all deaths are recorded in online obituaries. More comprehensive estimates, which consider wounded soldiers and missing personnel, suggest that the true number of Russian casualties may be significantly higher – perhaps six times the number reflected in obituary data.
The sheer scale of the losses, however, should not be underestimated. The Russian military is demonstrably consuming its resources at an alarming rate. Over the course of the war, they have expended a vast amount of material, including weaponry and equipment. This includes a considerable portion of the massive stockpile of Soviet-era arms and equipment that had been amassed over decades.
This unsustainable drain on resources is not limited to military hardware. The war is also inflicting a considerable economic cost on Russia, depleting its substantial sovereign wealth fund and threatening to bankrupt the nation. Furthermore, the conflict has irreparably damaged Russia’s international standing, leading to long-term negative repercussions in its relationships with other countries, as demonstrated by increased NATO membership.
Yet, despite these losses, Russia continues to advance, albeit slowly. The sheer size of its population and its willingness to tolerate extremely high casualty rates allow it to maintain a forward momentum, however costly. This relentless approach, however, comes at an immeasurable human and financial cost, effectively “spending” its human capital and material reserves indiscriminately.
It’s important to contextualize Russia’s losses within the broader framework of the conflict. Ukraine, too, suffers significant casualties and similar logistical challenges. However, the difference in scale between Russian and Ukrainian resources, personnel, and manpower, means Russia’s heavy losses stand out as a particularly critical issue. The net difference between recruitment numbers and casualty counts is a clearer indicator of the actual impact on military strength.
Ultimately, the picture of the ongoing war is complex and multifaceted. While January’s casualty figures are deeply concerning, especially in light of the previous months, the situation on the ground is far from simple. Russia continues its advance, fuelled by a seemingly unlimited supply of soldiers and a willingness to absorb immense losses. The long-term implications of this strategy, however, remain profoundly uncertain for the future of Russia itself.