By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to Donald Trump’s newly imposed tariffs, Premier François Legault convened a meeting with key Quebec financial leaders. The afternoon session included executives from Desjardins, Banque Nationale, Caisse de Dépôt, Investissement Québec, and Hydro-Québec, along with key ministers. Discussions focused on potential countermeasures, including the possibility of restricting hydroelectric power exports to the United States, a suggestion previously floated by Legault. Further action has already been taken, with the SAQ instructed to remove all American products from its shelves and distribution channels. A press conference is scheduled to follow the meetings.
Read the original article here
Quebec Premier François Legault’s summoning of the province’s bankers and investment banks this afternoon signals a significant shift in the province’s relationship with the United States. The erratic nature of US policy, swinging wildly from one extreme to another, has understandably fostered a lack of trust. The recent cancellation of Ontario’s Starlink contracts and the imposition of penalties on American bids for Ontario government contracts are clear examples of this unpredictable environment. This instability is further compounded by pronouncements from US officials regarding restrictions on US banks operating in Canada, fueling concerns about the future of economic ties.
The Premier’s meeting is likely driven by a deep-seated unease about the long-term implications of this instability. It’s not merely about individual contracts or tariffs; it’s a fundamental question of whether a reliable, predictable partnership with the US is even possible anymore. The unpredictable nature of US policy raises significant risks for Quebec’s economic future, necessitating a thorough reassessment of its economic ties with its southern neighbor.
Legault’s concerns extend beyond economic uncertainty. The possibility of power cuts to the US, though perhaps unlikely, underscores the power dynamics at play. Quebec possesses significant leverage, notably in energy exports and other resources. The province isn’t simply reacting; it’s considering strategic options to protect its interests. The ability to restrict or even completely cut off crucial resources like electricity to the US highlights the potential for Quebec to play a far more assertive role in its relationship with the US.
The situation is further complicated by the sheer scale of Quebec’s financial interconnectedness with the US. The Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, for example, has substantial investments in the US. Reassessing these investments, and potentially divesting from US assets, is a significant undertaking with far-reaching consequences for the Quebec economy and the Canadian financial system as a whole.
The claims surrounding the motivations behind the changing US policies are varied and often contradictory. While reasons like job protection, drug trafficking, immigration concerns, and even the aspiration for Canada to become a 51st state have been cited, the constant shifting of justifications undermines any sense of coherence or predictability. The complete lack of consistency from the US regarding their dealings with Canada makes it difficult to trust any statement or deal made. This uncertainty further necessitates a cautious reassessment of the relationship.
Beyond the economic considerations, the inherent instability poses a significant challenge to the notion of sovereignty and predictability in international relations. The US’s actions are not only unpredictable but also appear to disregard fundamental principles of respecting national sovereignty and providing stable, reliable trading partnerships. This disregard for established norms creates an environment in which other nations, particularly competitors like China, might gain an advantage.
The potential for alternative trading partners and investment strategies is significant. Canada’s substantial natural resources and strategic location provide considerable leverage in global markets. Exploring partnerships with nations outside the US could offer a more stable and predictable environment for Quebec’s economy and reduce its dependency on a volatile trading partner. This could also involve fostering stronger relationships within the Commonwealth or Europe.
The concerns surrounding US banking operations in Canada are particularly pertinent. The current claim that US banks cannot operate in Canada is demonstrably false, as numerous US financial institutions are actively operating within Canadian regulatory frameworks. However, this misrepresentation highlights a deeper concern: the potential for US pressure to weaken or deregulate Canada’s financial sector to facilitate increased US influence.
Furthermore, the potential for a significant economic crisis, potentially triggered by a collapse in the US financial system, further highlights the need for diversification. Past assistance provided by the Bank of Canada to stabilize the US banking system underscores the interdependency between the two nations. This interdependency, however, also underscores the risk to Canada from a US crisis, prompting Quebec to explore measures to safeguard its financial sector.
The situation warrants a broader strategic review, not just in Quebec but across Canada. The need to repatriate capital, strengthen domestic investment, and develop alternative alliances is increasingly clear. Canada’s strengths in agriculture, fishing, forestry, and energy reserves place it in a strong position to diversify its partnerships and reduce its reliance on the United States. The Premier’s meeting is not just a response to immediate threats; it is a strategic recalibration for a future where reliable and stable partnerships are paramount.