By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite President Trump’s claims of progress, U.S. and allied intelligence indicates that Vladimir Putin continues to aim for complete control of Ukraine, believing he can outwait Ukraine and Europe. Ongoing negotiations, while presenting a potential opening, are viewed skeptically; officials believe Putin may seek a ceasefire to regroup rather than a genuine peace. Putin’s maximalist goals remain unchanged, fueled by perceived U.S. concessions regarding NATO membership for Ukraine, raising concerns within the Ukrainian government about being excluded from meaningful negotiations.
Read the original article here
Intelligence suggests that Vladimir Putin isn’t genuinely interested in a real peace deal regarding Ukraine, despite ongoing negotiations with the United States. This conclusion isn’t surprising, given Ukraine and European assessments of the situation.
Putin’s potential concessions would only serve as a temporary regrouping strategy, not a genuine retreat. Any peace agreement acceptable to him would likely involve the complete annexation of Ukrainian territory, mirroring the situation in Crimea, or the installation of a puppet regime with no autonomy.
Such an outcome would almost certainly require the public execution of President Zelenskyy and high-ranking military officials. Russia’s stated refusal to cede any land underscores their lack of interest in ceasefires or genuine peace; their goal is Ukrainian surrender.
The current negotiations appear to be a tactical maneuver, not a sincere attempt at peacemaking. The focus isn’t on finding mutually agreeable terms but on achieving a situation favorable to Russia, regardless of the cost to Ukraine.
Furthermore, the situation raises concerns about potential backroom deals that could lead to the partition of Ukraine. This scenario involves a proposed agreement that Ukraine would reject, thereby further straining the US relationship with the EU and NATO. Such an outcome would benefit Putin, allowing him to undermine NATO and continue his aggression unimpeded.
There’s a strong possibility Putin will manipulate any negotiations to portray himself as a peacemaker while maintaining the initiative in the war. This approach would allow him to continue his aims while garnering public support, creating an ideal scenario for him.
The involvement of certain US political figures fuels suspicions that this strategy is more than a mere speculation. Their actions and pronouncements suggest a troubling level of complicity, or at least a lack of effective opposition. This collusion might ensure US support for Russia’s aims, weakening NATO and allowing the conflict to drag on.
The current situation also highlights the urgent need for greater international cooperation to counter Russia’s aggression. The lack of strong, unified action from other global powers could embolden Putin, and ultimately lead to further territorial expansion and instability.
It’s evident that Putin’s objectives extend beyond the current conflict. He aims to restore Russia’s influence and territorial reach, reversing post-Soviet setbacks.
The absence of any genuine peace proposals from Russia indicates that they only intend to gain leverage through negotiations and maintain the war effort indefinitely. Any “peace” is merely a tactical tool in a broader geopolitical strategy.
The current situation exposes a critical failure of international diplomacy. The lack of effective countermeasures allows Putin to exploit the system for his own gain. This necessitates a strategic shift to pressure Russia into genuine negotiation and to avoid further escalation.
Furthermore, the perceived lack of concern from some western figures suggests a lack of commitment to the principles of international law and self-determination. This alarming situation demands international attention and prompt action to deter Putin’s aggressive ambitions and uphold the principles of global peace and security.
The need for a decisive response cannot be overstated. The current trajectory suggests that without a substantial shift in global dynamics, Putin’s designs will prevail and further destabilize the region, setting a dangerous precedent for future conflicts. The urgency of this situation requires all relevant stakeholders to move beyond rhetoric and implement strategies to confront Putin’s aggression. The international community must actively discourage his tactics and support those suffering under his aggression.