President Trump signed an executive order establishing a White House Faith Office, renaming the existing Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, to advise on policy and grant access for faith-based organizations. Simultaneously, he announced a task force to investigate “anti-Christian bias” within the federal government, sparking criticism from some groups concerned about church-state separation. This action follows Trump’s comments about a renewed faith following near-death experiences and his administration’s past actions to roll back diversity initiatives. The new office and task force have drawn both support and strong condemnation from religious leaders across the political spectrum.
Read More
Despite the Trump administration’s termination, the National Nature Assessment, initiated by President Biden, will likely be completed and released. The report, based on extensive public input and volunteer contributions, aims to comprehensively assess nature loss’s impact on climate change and society, filling gaps in existing knowledge. Though its webpage was removed, the first draft is largely finished and the project maintains broad author consensus. The assessment intends to inform the development of “nature-based solutions” to advance US climate goals and economic well-being.
Read More
In response to potential US tariffs on Canadian goods, the NDP proposes a 100 per cent tariff on Tesla vehicles, citing Elon Musk’s criticism of Canada. To incentivize domestic EV purchases, the party pledges to reinstate and double the federal EV rebate to $10,000 for Canadian-made vehicles. This initiative aims to support Canadian consumers and the domestic auto industry while countering potential economic threats. The NDP’s strategy is framed as a proactive response to protect Canadian interests.
Read More
Donald Trump’s renewed threat of a 25% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum imports is causing immediate economic harm, mirroring the negative impacts of similar tariffs imposed in 2018. Canadian steel and aluminum companies are already experiencing cancelled orders and reduced sales, forcing them to reconsider expansion plans and potentially leading to job losses. This uncertainty is prompting businesses to halt investments and impacting the Canadian economy, with calls for government intervention and potential retaliatory measures. The situation highlights the precarious nature of the Canada-U.S. trading relationship and the unpredictable impact of protectionist policies.
Read More
President Trump signed orders imposing 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports, including from Canada, effective March 4th. These tariffs, justified as a means to boost domestic production, were enacted despite strong Canadian opposition and lack of prior warning. The Canadian government plans to analyze the implications and consult with international partners, while opposition parties advocate for immediate retaliatory measures against the U.S. This action marks a renewed escalation of trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada.
Read More
The Pentagon’s new policy prohibiting the use of official resources for diversity-focused events has led to the cancellation of military participation in the annual BEYA STEM conference, despite the event’s long history of successful recruitment for the Department of Defense. This decision, impacting federal funding of approximately $1.5 million, has resulted in numerous military branches and contractors withdrawing from the conference, including the Army, Air Force, Navy, and prominent organizations like SpaceX and Booz Allen Hamilton. While service members can attend unofficially, the cancellations significantly hinder recruitment efforts and mentorship programs vital for national STEM competitiveness. The abrupt policy change has left organizers scrambling to mitigate the impact on attendees and the conference’s overall success.
Read More
Following recent court losses, Trump condemned judicial rulings against him, asserting widespread fraud and abuse necessitate investigation, regardless of judicial decisions. This defiance, echoed by JD Vance, threatens the separation of powers, as it suggests disregard for judicial oversight of executive actions. The situation is further complicated by Musk’s significant campaign funding, raising concerns about undue influence. This escalating disregard for judicial authority risks a constitutional crisis with seemingly no effective check on the executive branch.
Read More
Vance’s assertion that judges are powerless to control Trump’s “legitimate power” presents a concerning challenge to the fundamental principles of checks and balances underpinning a democratic government. This claim fundamentally misunderstands the role of the judiciary in a constitutional republic.
The idea that a president’s actions are beyond judicial scrutiny is dangerous and historically inaccurate. The judicial branch exists precisely to interpret the law and ensure that all branches of government, including the executive, act within the confines of the Constitution. To suggest otherwise is to advocate for a system where power is unchecked and potentially tyrannical.
This argument ignores the numerous instances throughout American history where the Supreme Court has reviewed and, if necessary, limited the actions of the executive branch.… Continue reading
Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove ordered the dismissal of all corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a decision made without prejudice and potentially subject to future refiling. Bove’s memo suggested the charges were politically motivated, a claim disputed by legal experts. The charges, which included bribery and campaign finance violations stemming from Adams’ time as Brooklyn Borough President, were brought by a Biden-appointed U.S. attorney and will be reviewed upon the confirmation of a Trump-appointed replacement. Adams and his attorney have consistently maintained his innocence.
Read More
President Trump declined to endorse Vice President JD Vance as his successor in the 2028 Republican presidential nomination, citing it being too early to make such a decision. While praising Vance’s performance, Trump highlighted the numerous capable individuals within the Republican party. This statement surprised some, given Vance’s close alignment with Trump and widely perceived potential candidacy. The decision leaves open the question of who will lead the Republican party after Trump’s presidency, with numerous other candidates potentially emerging.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood