By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Investigators believe the January 29th midair collision between an American Airlines jet and a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter, resulting in 67 fatalities, may have been caused by a missed air traffic control instruction. Evidence suggests the Black Hawk crew, conducting a night vision goggle training exercise, may not have heard the instruction to pass behind the plane due to a depressed microphone. Discrepancies in altitude readings within the helicopter cockpit are also under investigation, and the American Airlines crew showed signs of seeing the helicopter just before impact. A final report is expected in over a year, but a preliminary report is forthcoming.
Read the original article here
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is investigating a helicopter collision that may have resulted from a failure to adhere to crucial instructions. Inconsistencies between cockpit altimeter readings and flight data recorder information are a key focus of the inquiry. It’s possible that the helicopter crew’s perception of altitude didn’t align with the actual altitude, recorded by the flight data recorder. This discrepancy raises questions about whether the pilots had an accurate understanding of their position in relation to the other aircraft.
The helicopter was improperly positioned in the path of the approaching American Airlines jet before the collision. While pilot error is a possibility, faulty cockpit instrumentation could also have played a significant role. Evidence suggests that the jet crew only saw the helicopter immediately before impact, evidenced by a rapid pitch up maneuver and maximum elevator deflection, suggesting a last-second attempt to avoid the collision.
A communication breakdown during the flight might have exacerbated the situation. At one point, the helicopter pilot in training reported the helicopter’s altitude as 300 feet, while the instructor stated it was at 400 feet. This demonstrates a clear miscommunication regarding the helicopter’s altitude, which was already dangerously close to the 200-foot ceiling in that area. Both pilots should have recognized their altitude as being too high, although their altitude was arguably between 300 and 400 feet and they were likely rounding. The actual collision occurred at approximately 325 feet.
The question of whether the helicopter crew received or heeded an instruction to pass behind the jet is less central to the immediate cause. They had acknowledged maintaining visual separation, but this visual separation was clearly insufficient and dangerous, given the speed of the jet. Regardless of hearing specific instructions, the helicopter should have recognized the inherent danger in its trajectory and avoided getting into the position it was in, in the first place. The helicopter’s flight path, near the landing path of the plane, was a significant safety concern from the outset.
The NTSB investigation is meticulously examining all factors. The possibility of flawed altimeter data is being explored, as this could have led to the helicopter crew’s misjudgment of their altitude and their relative position to the aircraft. Faulty cockpit instruments are not unheard of, and these types of equipment malfunctions have contributed to aviation incidents in the past. A witness corroborated the evasive maneuver by the airplane crew, adding another piece to the puzzle.
The location of the training flight itself has been questioned. Training in active airspace raises concerns, especially near a busy airport like DCA. However, training in the operational airspace is crucial for pilots, particularly those undertaking VIP transport, to ensure proficiency and safety in demanding environments. Accidents during training aren’t commonplace, implying that the inherent danger was amplified by the improper trajectory and the potential of faulty altimeters. The fact remains that the helicopter should never have been in a position where a 100-foot altimeter error could lead to a collision.
The NTSB emphasizes that the investigation is ongoing and has not yet assigned blame. The final report, due next year, will offer a comprehensive analysis of the incident, including a determination of all contributing factors and causal relationships. Speculation and conjecture should be avoided until the official report is released. It is crucial to determine the precise chain of events to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
The emphasis should be on understanding how this chain of events unfolded, learning from this incident, and using that knowledge to implement safety improvements across the board. A thorough and impartial investigation is paramount in improving aviation safety. The aviation industry’s dedication to safety is crucial, and every accident provides an opportunity to improve practices.
The high safety standards of the aviation industry are a direct result of continuous efforts to learn from and prevent the repetition of past tragedies. This accident highlights the need to investigate not only pilot actions, but also the integrity of aircraft instruments, training procedures, and flight planning. The analysis of the chain of events must include a close examination of the critical factors, however small they may seem, to avoid similar tragedies in the future. The overall goal is to ensure that this particular chain of events is broken to enhance aviation safety.