By John Q. Hosedrinker 
New emails reveal a deeper involvement of New Orleans Saints and Pelicans executives in handling the Archdiocese’s clergy abuse list than previously admitted. Top executives, including Greg Bensel, communicated directly with the District Attorney, seemingly influencing the list’s contents, a claim the team and DA deny. These communications, spanning over a year, show the teams actively managing the church’s public image and coordinating media responses. The emails contradict prior statements by both franchises and raise further questions about the extent of their involvement in the ongoing child sex abuse investigation. This newly revealed evidence underscores the close relationship between the sports franchises and the Catholic church in New Orleans.
Read the original article here
Emails have revealed how the New Orleans Saints and Pelicans organizations, both owned by the same individuals, aided in a cover-up of a child abuse scandal within a local church. This isn’t simply about poor judgment; it’s about the prioritization of reputation management over the well-being of children. The fact that these teams, with their associated images of integrity and community leadership, were involved underscores the gravity of the situation.
The released emails showcase a calculated effort to deflect blame and minimize the scandal’s impact, a strategy that demonstrates a shocking lack of moral compass. This coordinated attempt to spin the narrative highlights a disturbing willingness to protect institutional image at the expense of victims. The sheer audacity of these actions raises questions about the extent of the cover-up and the possible involvement of other individuals within the organizations.
The situation is reminiscent of other scandals, such as the Penn State case, where loyalty to an institution blinded individuals to the severity of the crimes being committed. The parallels are striking; the willingness to protect the reputation of a powerful entity, even in the face of horrific abuse, seems to transcend specific contexts. This pattern suggests a deeper systemic issue concerning the prioritization of image over justice.
The comparison to other scandals, such as the Patriots’ Spygate, is intriguing, but ultimately misses the mark in terms of severity. While both incidents involve attempts to gain an unfair advantage, the stakes in the Saints/Pelicans case are drastically higher. Cheating in a game pales in comparison to enabling and potentially facilitating the abuse of children. The actions taken by the Saints and Pelicans are not merely shady; they represent a profound betrayal of trust and a shocking indifference to the suffering of victims.
One might argue that all institutions, whether religious or secular, face similar challenges when confronted with crisis situations. However, the choice to actively participate in a cover-up, as opposed to cooperating with law enforcement, distinguishes this case. The decision to prioritize image and reputation over the welfare of abused children points to a fundamental moral failing. The actions of the Saints and Pelicans suggest a disturbing willingness to compromise ethical principles for the sake of self-preservation.
This situation underscores the urgent need for stronger legal protections for victims of abuse, along with greater accountability for those who enable or cover up such crimes. The current legal framework appears inadequate to deter this type of behavior, allowing powerful institutions to shield themselves from consequences, despite the devastating impact on victims. The need for legislative reform is obvious; existing laws simply are not enough.
This situation exposes a cynical disregard for the sanctity of children and the seriousness of sexual abuse. The emails paint a picture of calculating damage control, prioritizing the reputation of the Saints and Pelicans over the welfare of victims and their families. While some may argue that this is an isolated incident, the pattern suggests a more systemic problem of institutional protection and a troubling lack of accountability for those in positions of power.
The implications extend far beyond the specific individuals and organizations involved. This scandal serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the importance of prioritizing justice over image. The actions of the Saints and Pelicans organizations should serve as a stark reminder of the moral obligations that come with influence and responsibility. The silence surrounding the actions of these organizations is itself a form of complicity, a passive acceptance of a system that allows such abuse to fester and spread. This should encourage us to call for stronger oversight and more vigorous investigation into similar cover-ups within other institutions.
The actions of the Saints and Pelicans have not only damaged their own reputations, but have also eroded public trust in major sports organizations. The long-term consequences of this scandal are likely to be significant, potentially leading to increased scrutiny and reform within the NFL and NBA. The revelation of these emails compels a thorough investigation and a public reckoning with the systematic enabling of child abuse that is implied by these actions. Only then can we hope to truly address the underlying issues and prevent future tragedies.