By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Carlos Slim has terminated his partnership with Starlink, opting instead to invest $22 billion in expanding América Móvil’s telecommunications infrastructure over the next three years. This decision follows public tensions between Slim and Elon Musk, including a controversial tweet alleging Slim’s ties to organized crime. The move represents a significant blow to Starlink, costing it a major Latin American partner and billions in potential revenue. América Móvil’s investment redirects planned Starlink projects to Chinese and European companies, impacting not only Starlink’s financial prospects but also the U.S.’s commercial presence in the region.
Read the original article here
Carlos Slim’s decision to cancel his collaboration with Elon Musk’s Starlink stems from a seemingly irreconcilable rift between the two billionaires. The catalyst appears to be a controversial tweet by Musk, which contained an unsubstantiated accusation against Slim, linking him to organized crime. This public attack, regardless of its veracity, deeply offended Slim and proved to be the breaking point in their business relationship.
The cancellation carries significant weight, extending far beyond a simple business disagreement. Slim’s involvement was not insignificant; he was a major partner, providing access to a vast network across 25 countries. Losing this partnership represents a substantial blow to Starlink’s global reach and expansion plans, potentially jeopardizing future growth. This loss of ground is particularly damaging considering the competitive landscape and Starlink’s vulnerable position. The strategic advantage gained by Slim’s participation is now lost, leaving Starlink exposed to competitors.
The incident highlights the potential consequences of Musk’s impulsive and often controversial online behavior. This isn’t an isolated incident; a similar pattern emerged nine years ago during the first Trump administration. His penchant for provocative tweets has repeatedly led to negative repercussions for his businesses. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about his leadership style and decision-making process.
Beyond the immediate business implications, the fallout has geopolitical ramifications. The termination of the collaboration could further weaken the US’s commercial presence in certain regions, potentially benefiting China, a rising competitor in the space technology sector. Slim’s influence and market dominance in Latin American telecommunications adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
The situation underscores the high stakes involved in international business dealings and the critical need for diplomacy, especially when dealing with powerful individuals like Carlos Slim. His decision reflects not just a business calculation, but also a personal response to a perceived insult. The fact that Slim, a businessman known for his shrewdness and strategic thinking, chose to sever ties with Musk speaks volumes about the severity of the offense.
The incident also raises questions about the broader implications for the future of business partnerships involving controversial figures like Musk. His unpredictable behavior creates uncertainty and could deter potential collaborators in the future. It challenges the long-term viability of his ventures that require extensive and sustained partnerships.
Several commentators have pointed out the irony of Musk’s actions. The implication is that he underestimated the strength and influence of Slim, believing perhaps that his wealth and technological edge alone would grant him leverage. This miscalculation highlights a potential blind spot in Musk’s strategic thinking. It underscores the importance of appreciating the complex interplay between business acumen and political realities in the global marketplace.
The long-term consequences of this decision remain to be seen. However, the fallout serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of impulsive public pronouncements and the importance of cultivating and maintaining positive relationships in the world of high-stakes international business. Slim’s actions are being viewed, not just as a business decision, but as a clear display of strength, influence, and the rejection of unacceptable behavior. The ripple effect of this decision is likely to be felt far beyond the immediate parties involved.