By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Over 200,000 people protested in Munich on February 8th, 2025, against the far-right AfD party and the CDU’s perceived overtures towards it. These demonstrations, under the banner “Democracy needs you,” followed similar large-scale protests in Berlin the previous week. Concerns centered on the CDU’s collaboration with the AfD on an anti-immigration bill, a move seen as violating Germany’s long-standing taboo against working with the far right. Additional protests, including one in Hanover, also drew significant crowds ahead of crucial upcoming elections.
Read the original article here
The sheer scale of the recent anti-far-right march in Munich is truly striking. Estimates range from a conservative 200,000 participants—representing a significant portion of Munich’s population, perhaps around 20%—to more ambitious figures exceeding 300,000, according to organizers. This massive demonstration highlights a powerful collective rejection of far-right ideologies within the city.
The contrast between the size of this demonstration and the relatively limited coverage in American news outlets is noteworthy. While several sources confirm the substantial turnout, this powerful display of opposition to the far-right seems to have escaped the attention of many major American news organizations. This lack of coverage raises questions about news selection biases and perhaps even a degree of media complacency regarding the rise of extremism in Europe.
The sheer logistical feat of organizing and managing such a huge protest is also impressive. The event’s success underscores the strong community spirit in Munich and the power of collective action in the face of shared concerns. Even considering the considerable logistical challenges, like the city’s public transport capacity, the turnout was still extraordinary. The fact that tens of thousands likely walked to the protest site further illustrates the immense commitment of the participants.
The implications of such a large demonstration are considerable. It speaks volumes about the strength of opposition to far-right movements in Germany and the determination to prevent a repeat of the country’s dark past. This kind of mobilization could serve as an example for other countries grappling with the rise of similar movements. The event’s location, near the Oktoberfest grounds, suggests that the infrastructure already in place for large-scale events aided the success of the protest, ensuring smooth logistics for the huge crowds.
Interestingly, comparisons are being drawn between the Munich march and the political climate in the United States. The apparent lack of similar scale anti-extremist demonstrations in the US, coupled with observations about the difficulties of organizing large protests in the US due to geographic factors and the spread-out nature of the country, prompt reflection on the state of political engagement and the role of media in shaping public perception. It also raises questions about the accessibility of large-scale collective action in countries with less robust public transportation systems.
The contrasting perspectives on the size of the protest – with figures varying wildly depending on the source – highlights the challenges in accurately reporting on large public gatherings. While the discrepancies in numbers are significant, it remains clear that hundreds of thousands took part, regardless of the exact figure. These differing accounts also underscore the importance of verifying information from multiple sources before drawing firm conclusions. The comparison to the much-reported protests in France illustrates the uneven reporting on protests across Europe, with the French often disproportionately represented in the American media. This potentially stems from cultural biases or journalistic priorities.
The underlying current of urgency and concern running throughout the various comments is palpable. There’s a clear sense that the fight against far-right extremism is far from over, and the Munich march represents a crucial moment in this ongoing battle. The significant turnout, despite the logistical challenges and the potential for disagreement on the precise number of attendees, speaks volumes about the commitment of the participants and the seriousness of the issues at stake. Ultimately, the sheer scale of the Munich march serves as a potent symbol of resistance, offering a powerful counterpoint to the normalization or even the trivialization of the far right. The event raises important questions about the role of media coverage in shaping public understanding of political movements and the importance of collective action in a democracy.