By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A large-scale drone attack on Lipetsk Oblast on February 13th targeted the Novolipetsk Steel plant, a crucial facility responsible for a significant portion of Russia’s steel production. The attack, resulting in power outages and injuries, follows a previous attack on the same plant in February 2024. The Russian Defense Ministry claimed to have intercepted numerous drones across multiple regions, though these claims remain unverified. This incident adds to a series of recent drone strikes targeting Russian infrastructure deep within its territory.
Read the original article here
Russia’s largest steel mill, the Novolipetsk Steel (NLMK) plant, located in the Lipetsk region, was reportedly the target of a significant Ukrainian drone strike. This attack, described as a “massive raid” by the regional governor, occurred overnight on February 13th and highlights the escalating conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
The NLMK plant, a crucial asset for Russia’s steel production, accounting for 20% of the national output and owned by billionaire Vladimir Lisin, is situated approximately 400 kilometers from the Ukraine-Russia border. The strike’s proximity to the border underscores the expanding range of Ukrainian attacks on key Russian infrastructure.
The drone strike resulted in power outages affecting several districts in Lipetsk. The incident also caused injuries; one person was hospitalized with shrapnel wounds after debris from a downed drone struck a local aeration station. While Russia’s Defense Ministry claimed to have intercepted and destroyed 83 drones nationwide, including 12 in Lipetsk Oblast, the veracity of these claims remains unverified.
This attack follows a pattern of recent drone strikes targeting Russian energy infrastructure. These actions suggest a strategic shift in Ukraine’s approach, focusing on disrupting key economic sectors deep within Russian territory. The timing also coincides with ongoing military operations and persistent uncertainty surrounding diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict.
The question of whether Ukraine will halt such actions even with a purported peace agreement remains a contentious issue. Many believe that any peace agreement that doesn’t involve Russia’s complete withdrawal from all Ukrainian territories will be insufficient to stop the attacks. The possibility of a peace deal brokered by external actors, potentially without Ukraine’s full consent, is viewed with deep skepticism.
The ongoing conflict fuels speculation about the future of resource sourcing and economic ramifications. Concerns arise regarding potential shifts in global steel and aluminum markets, with some suggesting increased reliance on alternative suppliers, like Canada, as a result of the disruptions in Russian production. The potential for further escalations, including attacks on additional Russian industrial facilities, seems a very real possibility, driven by the determination of the Ukrainian people to defend their country.
The differing opinions on the potential impact of a US withdrawal from supporting Ukraine are quite stark. While some argue that a US withdrawal would lead to a collapse of the Ukrainian front, others maintain that the EU’s continued support and Ukraine’s own resolve would prevent such an outcome. The potential for further EU involvement is discussed, but concerns remain regarding the EU’s political will and capacity to fully offset the loss of US support.
There’s considerable speculation and debate surrounding the efficacy and intentions of any potential peace deal. Some analysts are deeply critical of the perceived imbalance of power and the historical lack of adherence to agreements by Russia. The perception that any agreement brokered without meaningful Ukrainian input is fundamentally flawed prevails. The current sentiment is strongly in favor of Ukraine continuing its actions until its key objectives are achieved.
The financial implications of the conflict are immense, affecting military spending on both sides, along with ongoing economic sanctions and the impact on global markets for essential resources like steel and aluminum. The disparity in military budgets between Russia and Ukraine is frequently cited, along with concerns regarding the continued supply of military equipment to Ukraine from its allies.
Ultimately, the drone strike on the NLMK steel plant represents a significant escalation in the conflict. The incident reinforces the ongoing challenges in finding a peaceful resolution and highlights the profound impact the war continues to have on both the battlefield and the global economy. The future trajectory of the conflict remains uncertain, dependent on various factors, including military actions, diplomatic efforts, and the continued support provided to Ukraine by its international partners.