Following a contentious White House meeting between Presidents Zelensky and Trump that ended without agreement on a mineral deal, Italian Prime Minister Meloni urged an immediate summit of the U.S., EU, and Western allies to address the ongoing situation in Ukraine. This call emphasizes the need for unified Western action, warning against divisions that weaken the West and benefit adversaries. Meloni’s proposal, to be communicated to allies shortly, follows recent reaffirmations of support for Ukraine from European leaders, highlighting growing concerns about exclusion from US-Russia negotiations. The proposed summit builds upon a previous meeting convened in Paris.

Read the original article here

Italy’s call for an immediate summit between the US and Europe following the recent clash between President Zelensky and Donald Trump highlights a growing rift within the Western alliance. The situation underscores a deep unease and a significant loss of trust in the US’s reliability as an ally.

The core issue revolves around the perception that Trump’s actions, and the potential for future similar behaviour, undermine the collective effort to support Ukraine and counter Russian aggression. Many feel his apparent pro-Russian stance represents a betrayal of established alliances and a dangerous gamble with global stability. The very notion of a summit involving Trump is viewed by many as a waste of time, unproductive, and potentially counterproductive to achieving a resolution to the conflict.

The sheer volume of concern expressed regarding Trump’s influence and potential for sabotage is staggering. The fear isn’t just about his potential for erratic behaviour, but the belief that his actions actively aid Russia’s strategic goals. Concerns range from accidental leaks of crucial information to deliberate undermining of negotiations. His unpredictable behavior throws a huge wrench in the meticulously planned efforts towards a unified response.

Italy’s proposal, therefore, might be interpreted not as a genuine attempt to facilitate a productive dialogue with the US, but rather a desperate plea for the US to clarify its position and reaffirm its commitment to the transatlantic alliance. The call for a summit could be viewed as an attempt to avert a complete collapse of the Western coalition, a scenario many see as increasingly plausible.

Many observers see Europe’s trust in the US irrevocably eroded. The perceived betrayal of Ukraine, through Trump’s actions, has pushed many to advocate for a more independent European approach to foreign policy, specifically in relation to Russia. The idea of excluding the US from future negotiations and security discussions is gaining traction, fueled by a belief that any agreement reached with US involvement is suspect and could be easily jeopardized.

The idea of self-reliance is becoming increasingly attractive. A united Europe, coordinating its own defense and foreign policy initiatives, without US interference, is now being envisioned as a necessary step. This is not about isolationism but rather about regaining control over their own destinies and ensuring that their security interests are prioritized above internal political maneuvering within the US.

The argument to freeze out the US isn’t driven by spite but by a pragmatic assessment of the current situation. The prevailing view is that engaging with the US, in its current state, is a futile endeavor. The perceived unreliability of the US, due to internal political divisions and the unpredictable behavior of its leadership, makes collaboration seem incredibly risky.

The intense emotions surrounding the situation reflect the gravity of the crisis. Anger, frustration, and disappointment are widespread, both among European leaders and their citizens. The feelings of betrayal run deep, particularly given the years of collaboration and mutual support within the Western alliance. There’s a deep sense that the current political climate in the US represents a serious threat to global stability.

The proposed summit, therefore, has the potential to become more of a confrontational forum than a collaborative one. The underlying issues extend far beyond the immediate crisis in Ukraine; they point to a fundamental reassessment of the transatlantic relationship and the role of the US in global affairs. The true objective behind Italy’s proposal might be to force a reckoning – a moment of truth where the US must either recommit to its allies or accept the consequences of its actions. The hope, however faint, is to salvage the alliance, but the current climate suggests an uphill battle.