By John Q. Hosedrinker 
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot deems Russia’s return to the G7 currently impossible due to its undemocratic actions and aggression against G7 members. He highlighted Russia’s increasingly autocratic nature and its unprovoked war in Ukraine as key obstacles. However, Barrot left open the possibility of future reintegration contingent upon a “just and lasting peace” in Ukraine and renewed engagement with the Russian people. This contrasts with recent statements by US President Trump advocating for Russia’s reinstatement.
Read the original article here
The French foreign minister’s assertion that Russia’s return to the G7 is “unimaginable” reflects a widespread sentiment among many nations. It’s not merely a matter of technicalities, as Russia’s expulsion wasn’t a mere procedural change; it represents a fundamental shift in geopolitical realities. The idea that Russia could simply rejoin as if nothing significant happened is absurd given the current circumstances.
The very premise of the G7 – a group of leading democratic nations – is irreconcilable with Russia’s current actions. Russia’s actions, including the violation of international norms, specifically its ongoing war in Ukraine, stand in stark contrast to the principles of democratic governance and respect for international law that underpin the G7’s foundation. A return would require an unprecedented level of amnesia about Russia’s aggressive behavior.
Furthermore, the decision-making process within the G7 requires unanimity. Therefore, any attempt by Russia to re-enter the group would be immediately vetoed. This highlights the depth of distrust and opposition Russia faces within the international community, ensuring that there’s practically no chance of a unilateral return to the table. The notion of Russia slipping back in under the radar is simply out of the question.
Beyond the political realities, the deeply ingrained mistrust stemming from Russia’s past actions further solidifies this position. The downing of passenger planes, the ongoing war crimes in Ukraine, and other demonstrably aggressive actions paint a picture of a state that actively disregards international law and human life. These atrocities are not easily forgotten or forgiven, especially within a context of diplomacy and cooperation. The idea of a simple return is far removed from the reality of Russia’s actions.
Several alternative scenarios illustrate the far-fetched nature of Russia’s return. Inviting Putin to a G7 summit only to arrest him for war crimes presents a highly improbable, and frankly, unrealistic option. Similarly, the suggestion that Russia might be included in a potential future G8 arrangement, alongside other nations, only highlights how Russia is increasingly isolated from the major players on the global stage.
The suggestion of a new global alignment with Russia, China, and the USA – a G3 – also seems unlikely and risky. While such a grouping might seem powerful on paper, the inherent instability and conflict of interest between these powers would likely lead to its eventual failure. The potential for global instability outweighs any hypothetical benefits from such an arrangement.
The focus on a Russian return to the G7 often obscures a larger issue: Russia’s own seeming disinterest in genuine reintegration into the West. Putin’s efforts to engage in diplomatic efforts might appear superficially conciliatory, but they should not be mistaken for a genuine desire to return to an organization whose principles it demonstrably rejects. His actions speak louder than words.
The possibility of a diminished G7 also exists, due to potential withdrawals of member states. This underscores the fragility of global alliances and the increasingly fractured nature of international cooperation. But even a smaller G7 is unlikely to include Russia, given the continued, deep distrust stemming from Russia’s behavior. A reduction in the number of members would not change the fundamental facts.
The broader narrative surrounding Russia’s potential return emphasizes the need for a robust, unified response to aggression. The focus should be on strengthening existing alliances, fostering international cooperation, and ensuring that those who violate international law are held accountable. The idea that Russia can simply re-enter the G7, ignoring its past transgressions and current actions, highlights a concerning lack of awareness of the gravity of the situation. The simple truth remains that Russia’s return to the G7 is unimaginable, given the context of the existing geopolitical landscape.