By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), responsible for handling appeals from terminated federal employees, is facing an unprecedented surge in cases following widespread Trump administration layoffs. A recent influx of at least 1,845 cases in a single week—compared to approximately 100 weekly cases previously—threatens to overwhelm the board’s capacity, potentially causing significant delays in processing appeals. This backlog, echoing a similar situation in 2013, is raising concerns about the ability of the MSPB to ensure timely and fair reviews of employee appeals, especially given allegations of politically motivated terminations. Experts warn that this situation risks undermining the integrity of the civil service system.
Read the original article here
The sheer volume of appeals from fired federal workers is overwhelming the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), creating a massive backlog and threatening to cripple its ability to function. This isn’t a mere administrative issue; it’s a deliberate strategy designed to undermine the federal government.
The delays are staggering. Where appeals once took over a year, they now stretch to two years or more, potentially even longer. This deliberate slowdown significantly impacts the lives of affected employees, many of whom face financial hardship and uncertainty while waiting for a resolution.
Some speculate that this situation is intentionally created to showcase government inefficiency, to further a narrative that democracy is broken and needs a “strongman” to fix it. This plays into a larger, more insidious plan – the dismantling of democratic processes and institutions.
The current crisis is part of a broader assault on the federal government, aimed at weakening its effectiveness and legitimacy. By flooding the system with appeals, the goal is to create dysfunction and chaos, ultimately paving the way for authoritarian rule. This strategy is a calculated denial-of-service attack, crippling a vital part of the judicial system.
This isn’t accidental incompetence; it’s a carefully orchestrated effort. The firings themselves, coupled with the deliberate undermining of the appeals process, create a perfect storm of bureaucratic paralysis. The end goal appears to be the complete destruction of the current federal system, creating a power vacuum that can be filled by a more autocratic regime.
The scale of this problem is immense. The backlog is growing exponentially, and the timeline for resolution extends far into the future, potentially decades. Many employees may die before their cases are even heard, highlighting the profound human cost of this intentional gridlock. The sheer number of cases makes it difficult for the MSPB to even begin to process them all in a reasonable timeframe.
This systematic dismantling extends beyond the MSPB. It includes the firing or replacement of key personnel in various agencies, further weakening the ability of the government to function effectively. The courts themselves may become involved but the goal appears to be to keep the appeals process so mired in backlog as to make any legal remedies near impossible.
The eventual aim seems to be a complete overhaul of the federal government, replacing it with a system that lacks checks and balances and operates as an essentially unchecked entity. This aligns with a broader strategy observed in several other countries that have seen similar attacks on their democratic systems, resulting in an increase of centralized control.
The potential consequences are severe and long-lasting. The damage to trust in government, coupled with the social and economic disruption caused by the backlog, will have profound and lasting effects on the country. This is a calculated risk, aimed at reshaping the political landscape in a way that favors a more authoritarian form of government.
The possibility of an anti-mass layoff procedure where a default win occurs after an excessive delay is mentioned, suggesting an avenue of recourse. However, given the magnitude of the problem and the deliberate nature of the actions causing it, obtaining justice through established legal channels may prove exceptionally difficult.
This situation highlights the urgent need for intervention. Congress has the power to address this, but whether or not they will is questionable. The current political climate makes it unclear if there is the will, or the ability, to effectively counter this deliberate attack on the federal government. The longer this situation continues, the more entrenched the damage becomes.
Ultimately, this unfolding crisis underscores the fragility of democratic institutions and the danger of allowing such systematic undermining to occur unchecked. The question becomes whether the system can withstand this level of assault and recover, or whether the current trajectory will lead to a fundamentally altered political landscape. This struggle is not merely about the fate of the MSPB, but about the future of American democracy itself.