By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a suspected sabotage incident involving a Russian oil tanker in the Baltic Sea, European nations are privately exploring large-scale seizures of similar vessels. This consideration stems from concerns over Russia’s “shadow fleet” circumventing sanctions and the potential for further sabotage, particularly of critical infrastructure. Proposed legal frameworks for seizures are under development, leveraging international law and potentially national legislation to address the issue. The significant volume of sanctioned Russian oil transiting the Gulf of Finland underscores the urgency of these discussions. These actions are taken in response to increased security threats and intelligence warnings of potential Russian sabotage.
Read the original article here
Europe is considering a significant escalation in its response to Russia’s sanctions-evading “shadow fleet,” according to a recent Politico report. The focus is shifting from individual incidents to a large-scale seizure of these aging tankers, many of which are suspected of being involved in illicit activities. This dramatic shift in strategy follows several concerning events, notably the damage to an undersea power cable linking Finland and Estonia, an incident strongly suspected to involve one of these vessels.
The seizure of the Eagle S tanker in Finnish waters, carrying Russian oil and linked to the cable damage, has served as a catalyst. This incident not only highlights the brazenness of Russia’s attempts to circumvent sanctions but also showcases Finland’s willingness to take decisive action, prompting a stronger NATO presence in the Baltic Sea. The implications are far-reaching, pushing Europe to consider bolder and more proactive measures.
The current legal framework presents a challenge. While the activities of the shadow fleet clearly constitute sanction evasion – essentially smuggling on a massive scale – existing laws haven’t been sufficient to justify widespread seizures. Consequently, Europe is now drafting new legislation to provide the necessary legal basis for such actions. This legislative effort could include leveraging international law, focusing on environmental violations or acts of piracy, as potential grounds for seizure. Alternatively, individual countries could enact national laws to extend their jurisdictional reach and enable the arrest of these vessels in more distant maritime zones.
The scale of the problem is substantial. Estimates suggest that a significant portion of sanctioned Russian oil trade transits the Gulf of Finland, underscoring the vulnerability of the region and the importance of addressing the issue swiftly. Intelligence reports further reinforce the urgency, warning of potential Russian sabotage targeting critical infrastructure, including power cables, wind turbines, and gas pipelines in the Nordic countries. These threats underscore the need for a decisive response that goes beyond individual seizures.
The proposed large-scale seizures present a compelling solution. The potential downside of seizing these ships is minimal, as the shadowy nature of their ownership makes it virtually impossible for anyone to legitimately protest the actions. Any attempt to challenge the seizures in court would inherently reveal involvement in illegal activities, effectively silencing potential opposition. The vessels themselves are often in poor condition and pose safety hazards. Their seizure and scrapping would also remove a significant tool from Russia’s arsenal for evading sanctions.
The slow response from Europe has been criticized. The current mulling over a course of action raises concerns. Some suggest that Europe’s reluctance stems from a desire to avoid escalating tensions, a caution that may be overly cautious given Russia’s demonstrated disregard for international norms. The continued operation of these vessels presents a clear and present danger, not only economically, but also in terms of potential sabotage and environmental damage.
This strategic shift aligns with broader efforts to counter Russia’s aggressive actions. Ukraine has already imposed sanctions on individuals associated with the shadow fleet, targeting captains and crew involved in illicit oil exports. The international community, including the EU, the UK, and the US, has also imposed sanctions on numerous vessels involved. The proposed large-scale seizures represent a significant step forward, building upon existing efforts to disrupt Russia’s ability to circumvent sanctions. The urgency of the situation is undeniable, and the potential consequences of inaction are severe, making the proposed seizures a timely and necessary step. The situation calls for proactive action, not just continued discussion. Europe must seize the opportunity to dismantle this illicit operation decisively.