The Nevada Supreme Court rejected Steve Wynn’s appeal to overturn a lower court ruling against him in a defamation case stemming from a 2021 article detailing allegations of sexual misconduct. The court found Wynn failed to demonstrate actual malice in the reporting of the manicurist’s account of forced sexual contact. Wynn’s subsequent Supreme Court petition argues that the current media landscape, characterized by readily accessible publishing and a prevalence of potentially inaccurate reporting, renders the established defamation standard obsolete. This petition seeks to overturn the established precedent in light of these changed circumstances.
Read the original article here
WTF is DOGE doing in the department in charge of nuclear weapons? That’s the question burning in many minds, and frankly, it’s a terrifying one. The sheer audacity of the situation is staggering; the potential consequences are catastrophic. We’re talking about individuals, possibly lacking the necessary security clearances and expertise, potentially gaining access to information that could compromise global security. This isn’t some minor data breach; this is about nuclear weapons.
The idea of untrained individuals, perhaps driven by curiosity or malicious intent, rooting through databases containing sensitive information about our nuclear arsenal is deeply unsettling. It raises serious questions about the effectiveness of existing security protocols. Are our IT systems truly secure enough to prevent unauthorized access? Are auditing procedures robust and effective enough to detect and deter such intrusions? If not, the ramifications are far-reaching and profoundly concerning.
The hope that detailed logs exist, meticulously recording every search and access attempt, offers a small degree of comfort. This assumes, of course, that competent IT professionals established and maintain these logging systems, and that these logs haven’t been compromised or deleted. The possibility of bringing those responsible to justice hinges on these logs providing irrefutable evidence. Yet, even with irrefutable evidence, successfully prosecuting these individuals would require the political will to pursue justice, regardless of potential consequences.
The current political climate casts a long shadow over this issue. The very real possibility that those with the power to investigate and prosecute might be unwilling or unable to do so is deeply troubling. Inaction would not only embolden those responsible for this breach but also severely undermine national security. The sheer scale of potential damage is almost unimaginable. The implications extend far beyond simple data theft; we’re dealing with the potential for nuclear secrets falling into the wrong hands.
Concerns extend beyond the mere possibility of data theft. The suspicion is that the individuals involved might be actively seeking vulnerabilities in the systems controlling our nuclear arsenal. This could involve identifying software weaknesses, backdoors, or other exploitable flaws that could potentially enable the unauthorized launch or manipulation of these weapons. This prospect alone should send chills down anyone’s spine. Such actions represent a profound betrayal of trust and an act of potential treason.
The potential for foreign involvement adds another layer of complexity and danger. The idea that stolen nuclear secrets might be sold to hostile nations or used to blackmail the U.S. government is a genuine threat, and a terrifyingly realistic one. This scenario raises serious concerns about our national security and the very fabric of democratic governance. This isn’t a matter of political ideology; this is a matter of global security.
The disturbing silence surrounding this issue is equally concerning. The lack of transparency and the apparent absence of accountability creates an atmosphere of suspicion and uncertainty. The situation is further aggravated by the lack of trust in institutions that are meant to protect our national security. The feeling that no one is in charge, or that those in charge are unwilling to act, leaves many with a sense of profound helplessness.
Ultimately, the question “WTF is DOGE doing in the department in charge of nuclear weapons?” transcends partisan politics. It’s a question of national security, global stability, and the very survival of our civilization. The urgent need for a thorough investigation, coupled with the swift and decisive prosecution of those responsible, cannot be overstated. The stakes are simply too high. The silence surrounding this issue is deafening, and the potential for catastrophic consequences is undeniably real.