By John Q. Hosedrinker 
This article profiles Chechen and Belarusian volunteers fighting with the Ukrainian Foreign Legion, highlighting their experiences in past conflicts and their perspectives on the ongoing war. Veterans like Benor, who fought in the Second Chechen War, and Stare, a Belarusian exile, share their reasons for joining the Ukrainian army, emphasizing Russia’s broken promises and the ongoing threat to their homelands. Their experiences underscore a deep distrust of Russia and a belief that only Ukraine’s continued resistance will prevent a similar fate from befalling other nations. The piece uses their stories to illustrate the long-term consequences of Russian aggression and the determination of fighters to prevent further expansionist moves.
Read the original article here
The unwavering conviction among Chechen, Georgian, and Belarusian fighters in Ukraine is stark: you can’t trust Putin. Their experiences, shaped by Russia’s history of broken promises and aggressive actions, inform a deep-seated distrust that transcends political rhetoric. These individuals, risking their lives against a common enemy, offer a chillingly consistent warning. Their lived realities paint a picture far more nuanced than headlines.
This isn’t simply about geopolitical maneuvering; it’s a matter of survival. For many, the current conflict in Ukraine echoes past betrayals, highlighting a pattern of Russian aggression masked by deceptive peace agreements. The memory of broken promises, like the Khasavyurt Accords, fuels their fierce resistance. The narrative of “peace” offered by Russia is viewed with profound skepticism, a cynical ploy designed to lull opponents into a false sense of security before the inevitable strike.
The experience of Chechens, in particular, resonates deeply. The scars of past conflicts, where initial victories were followed by devastating setbacks after periods of rearmament and internal division orchestrated by Russia, serve as a cautionary tale. The current Ukrainian situation is seen as a repeat performance of this manipulative tactic, a strategy aiming to break the Ukrainian resolve.
The perspective of those fighting for Ukraine isn’t limited to a singular national grievance. Georgians and Belarusians also bring their own stories of Russian aggression and broken trust to the conflict. They see the current invasion of Ukraine not in isolation, but as part of a larger pattern of Russian expansionism and disregard for international norms. This shared experience of betrayal transcends individual national borders, forging a united front against a common threat.
The cynical manipulation goes beyond the battlefield. The control of information, the suppression of dissent, and the creation of a biased narrative within Russia itself are all highlighted as major concerns. The very existence of an unbiased news source originating from within Russia’s sphere of influence is questionable, raising concerns about the ability of the Russian people to access alternative perspectives. The regime’s heavy-handed control is undeniable.
Furthermore, the belief that Putin’s death would automatically usher in an era of peace and cooperation is naive at best. The pervasive fear is that a successor, even a less outwardly aggressive one, would still inherit the existing power structures and continue the pattern of authoritarianism. The underlying problem isn’t just one man; it’s the system itself that breeds such distrust. Putin’s perceived respect for only power, not agreements, is a reflection of this inherent instability.
The ongoing situation in Chechnya, Belarus, and Georgia further underscores the inherent danger of trusting Russia’s promises. While superficial peace may exist in Chechnya, it’s a peace born out of brutal suppression, not genuine reconciliation. Belarus, though not directly invaded, functions as a willing accomplice to Russia’s aggression. Georgia remains partially occupied, with Russia continuing to support separatist movements and asserting its influence. These examples serve as chilling reminders of the long-term consequences of Russian interference.
The fighters in Ukraine see the situation clearly: trust in Russia is misplaced and incredibly dangerous. Their warnings resonate not just as personal experiences, but as a crucial lesson for the world. Ignoring these voices means risking a repeat of the cycle of violence and betrayal that has shaped their lives and the lives of countless others. The shared experience of these fighters serves as a potent warning, underscoring the need for vigilance and a clear-eyed understanding of Russia’s intentions. Their lived experiences reveal a deeper, more enduring threat than simple geopolitical posturing – the persistent and pervasive danger of Russian betrayal.