By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Since the 2024 US presidential election, Bluesky has experienced explosive growth, adding over 14 million users to reach 30 million by January 31st. This surge follows significant changes to X (formerly Twitter), including altered blocking features and updated terms of service, prompting many users to migrate. Notable figures like Mark Hamill and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have joined, highlighting Bluesky’s increasing popularity and its similarity to X in design and function. Despite its rapid growth, Bluesky still lags behind established competitors like X and Threads in overall user numbers.
Read the original article here
Bluesky boasts over 30 million users, a significant surge fueled largely by those abandoning Twitter following Elon Musk’s acquisition and subsequent changes. The exodus from Twitter, driven by factors ranging from the overwhelming presence of ads and hate speech to the algorithm’s promotion of paid users and Musk’s own intrusive presence, has created a substantial influx into Bluesky. Many users describe the experience as a welcome relief from the toxicity and algorithm manipulation prevalent on X (formerly Twitter).
Bluesky’s appeal is multifaceted. The absence of engagement-baiting monetization and the impossibility of paying for increased visibility create a level playing field, contrasting sharply with Twitter’s current model. This, combined with the lack of Musk’s constant presence in users’ feeds, contributes significantly to a more positive and less intrusive user experience. Many see this as a refreshing change from the often chaotic and unpleasant experience on Twitter.
The platform’s design also plays a crucial role in its appeal. Unlike Twitter’s singular, often opaque algorithm, Bluesky allows users greater control over their feeds. The ability to curate content through manually created feeds or utilizing pre-made “starter packs” gives individuals the power to shape their online experience, reducing exposure to unwanted content. This decentralized approach to content moderation empowers users to filter out hateful or bigoted material and actively block trolls and bots.
While Bluesky isn’t without its shortcomings, many users find its lack of a central, all-controlling algorithm a major advantage. The absence of a single algorithm makes it significantly more challenging for toxic content and manipulative tactics to dominate the platform. This user-driven approach to content curation and moderation forms the foundation of Bluesky’s contrasting, arguably more wholesome, social media environment.
The entertainment sector’s representation remains a developing area, with some users noting a smaller presence of musicians, comedians, and entertainment news compared to Twitter. This, however, is seen by some as an opportunity for organically-grown communities to build and flourish rather than being overwhelmed by bigger accounts. Others suggest it will grow over time as more users migrate over and creators find their audience.
Despite its rapidly growing user base, Bluesky’s future is not without uncertainty. Concerns linger about potential issues like the long-term sustainability of the platform and the potential for an influx of harmful content as its popularity grows. The question of how Bluesky will handle the inevitable increase in users and the challenge of maintaining its current positive atmosphere remain unanswered. This, coupled with concerns about potential acquisition by Musk or similar entities, highlight the need for ongoing vigilance and community effort in maintaining the platform’s current integrity.
The platform’s reliance on user-driven moderation and its decentralized structure offer a significant contrast to the centralized, algorithm-driven experience found on Twitter. This distinction underscores a fundamental difference in philosophy between the two platforms and plays a major role in Bluesky’s appeal. But this very difference also leads to apprehension about the platform’s ability to scale, moderate, and sustain its current culture.
Many users point to the potential for Bluesky to be a truly democratic social media platform, where the individual user has more control than on other platforms. This aspect, coupled with its relative freedom from algorithms and intrusive features, creates an experience perceived as refreshing and more aligned with the original ideals of social media interaction. Still, even with a large user base, certain niche areas may lag in growth, demanding patience and active participation from users to create and cultivate thriving communities.
The transition from Twitter to Bluesky isn’t merely a migration; it represents a shift in expectations. Many see it as a move away from the centralized control and manipulative tactics of established social media giants towards a platform offering greater user agency and community-based moderation. The success of Bluesky hinges on the ability of its community to navigate the challenges of growth while preserving the platform’s current positive atmosphere. The coming months and years will reveal if Bluesky can successfully maintain its appeal and achieve lasting success.