By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The 2024 election was marred by widespread voter suppression, disproportionately impacting voters of color. Millions of voters were purged from rolls, challenged by vigilante groups, or had their ballots disqualified due to minor errors. This suppression, estimated to have cost Kamala Harris at least 3,565,000 votes, likely changed the outcome in key swing states, resulting in a loss for Harris despite winning the popular vote. Without this suppression, Harris would have won the presidency with 286 electoral votes.
Read the original article here
Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won. The sheer scale of alleged voter suppression in the recent election is staggering. Millions of votes were effectively erased, not through outright fraud, but through a calculated and systematic dismantling of access to the ballot box.
This wasn’t a matter of a few hundred votes here and there; we’re talking millions. Millions of registered voters were purged from rolls, their right to participate in the democratic process summarily revoked. This wasn’t an accident; it was a deliberate and targeted attack on the electorate.
The disqualification of mail-in ballots for minor clerical errors, often seemingly arbitrary, is another glaring example. Hundreds of thousands of ballots were rejected, not for fraudulent activity, but for minor mistakes— mistakes that could have easily been rectified with a simple follow-up or clarification. The sheer volume of these rejected ballots paints a picture of a system intentionally designed to limit participation.
And then there are the provisional ballots. Over a million provisional ballots were rejected, left uncounted, hanging in the balance. These ballots represent the voices of voters whose participation was, at best, stalled, and at worst, completely nullified by procedural hurdles. These procedural hurdles, often confusing and overly complex, served as a de facto barrier to voting, disproportionately impacting certain segments of the population.
This wasn’t confined to a single state; it was a nationwide phenomenon. Reports from across the country tell a consistent story: widespread voter suppression, meticulously planned and executed. The scale of the alleged voter suppression is breathtaking, making one wonder about the true outcome of the election.
Furthermore, the rejection of new voter registrations adds another layer to this troubling picture. Millions of new registrations were either rejected or not processed in time, silencing the voices of those attempting to participate for the first time or those who had recently relocated. This raises serious questions about the fairness and accessibility of the electoral process.
The impact of this widespread voter suppression is undeniable. It’s not just about a few swing states; it’s about the erosion of faith in the democratic process itself. When millions of votes are effectively suppressed, it undermines the very foundation of a representative government. It raises troubling questions about the legitimacy of election results and the fairness of the system.
The problem extends beyond simply quantifying the number of suppressed votes. The very act of suppressing votes sends a chilling message, discouraging participation and fostering cynicism towards the political system. This chilling effect likely extends beyond those directly affected, creating a climate of disengagement and distrust.
It’s also important to recognize the political context surrounding these events. The alleged systematic voter suppression wasn’t a spontaneous occurrence; it was a coordinated effort, driven by specific political agendas and fueled by partisan interests. This coordinated effort to restrict voting rights deserves scrutiny and understanding within the larger political landscape.
The lack of mainstream media coverage on this issue is alarming. The sheer scale of the alleged suppression warrants a thorough investigation and public discussion. The silence on this issue from major news organizations raises questions about journalistic integrity and the public’s right to know. The lack of attention given to this issue speaks volumes about the fragility of democratic processes and the need for greater transparency and accountability.
While some claim the low voter turnout should bear the blame, the systematic suppression of millions of votes cannot be ignored. Even if a significant percentage of eligible voters chose not to participate, the intentional suppression of votes through bureaucratic hurdles and administrative roadblocks is a critical factor to consider.
In conclusion, while the initial focus might be on the candidate who lost, the bigger story is the successful suppression of millions of votes. This is a far more insidious threat to democracy than any single election outcome. The impact of this alleged voter suppression will be felt for years to come, impacting not only the results of individual elections but the very integrity of the democratic process itself. The silence surrounding this issue demands our attention and the implementation of serious reforms to ensure fair and equitable access to the ballot box.