By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The recently viral “Simple Sabotage Field Manual,” a declassified WWII-era CIA document, offers strategies for disrupting enemy operations through seemingly innocuous actions. The guide, now a top Project Gutenberg ebook, details tactics ranging from hindering workplace efficiency to undermining morale, emphasizing methods requiring minimal risk. Authored under William Donovan, the manual highlights the effectiveness of citizen sabotage against the Nazis and provides specific examples applicable to various settings. Its current popularity may reflect contemporary anxieties around workplace loyalty and control.
Read the original article here
A declassified CIA guide to sabotaging fascism has unexpectedly gone viral, sparking widespread interest and discussion. The guide, originally created during World War II by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the precursor to the CIA, offers a surprisingly relevant toolkit for navigating and potentially disrupting oppressive systems. Its sudden surge in popularity seems connected to a feeling of widespread disillusionment and frustration among workers, particularly those facing increased pressure and perceived unfair treatment in their workplaces.
The guide’s tactics focus on using bureaucratic processes to hinder productivity and morale. It suggests strategies such as insisting on strict adherence to procedures, thereby slowing down decision-making; engaging in lengthy discussions and debates, often focusing on irrelevant issues; and deliberately misinterpreting orders or requests. These techniques, while appearing passive, aim to create a climate of inefficiency and frustration, subtly undermining the system’s ability to function smoothly.
Another key element of the guide is manipulating work assignments, specifically by assigning important tasks to incompetent workers or faulty equipment, thus ensuring that projects are completed slowly and poorly. Additionally, it advises promoting inefficient workers while unfairly criticizing efficient ones, a strategy designed to lower overall morale and productivity. The guide also emphasizes the importance of excessive paperwork, deliberate errors in documentation, and the use of excessively long meetings to consume valuable time and resources.
The guide’s rediscovery has resonated with many, who see its tactics reflected in their own workplace experiences. The methods described, such as “weaponized incompetence” and “malicious compliance,” are seen by some as tools for resistance against perceived injustices, especially in situations characterized by authoritarian management styles. Many commentators linked this guide to current anxieties and perceived injustices, specifically noting the parallels between the guide’s techniques and modern workplace dynamics.
The viral spread of the document also highlights the enduring appeal of unconventional strategies for navigating power structures. In a time where many feel powerless, the guide’s suggestions offer a sense of agency, however small. The perceived relevance of the document has fueled discussions around resistance and the potential for collective action within organizations that feel oppressive.
The unexpected resurgence of this declassified guide presents a fascinating case study in the intersection of historical documents, contemporary events, and the enduring human desire for resistance. The guide’s simple yet effective strategies resonate deeply with many who find themselves caught in frustrating and sometimes oppressive work environments.
Some commentators have drawn parallels between the guide’s tactics and the ongoing struggle against political extremism. Others have emphasized the importance of ethical considerations, cautioning against tactics that could harm colleagues or jeopardize individual safety. However, the overall tone is one of empowerment and a sense of shared experience, fostering a sense of community among those who feel disenfranchised and marginalized.
The timing of the guide’s viral moment is certainly noteworthy, coinciding with broader societal anxieties and discontent. The guide appears to offer a framework for those feeling overwhelmed or powerless to take back a degree of control, even if only subtly. Its newfound relevance underscores the timeless nature of resistance strategies and the enduring need for individuals to navigate power structures effectively. The guide’s focus on bureaucratic manipulation is especially compelling, as it offers a way to resist without direct confrontation.
The discussion surrounding the viral guide also highlights the increasing prominence of online communities in facilitating the spread of information and the organization of collective action. The shared experience and feeling of solidarity amongst commenters highlight a common desire to find strategies for coping with what many perceive as unjust workplace dynamics. The guide’s accessibility has given voice to feelings that many have previously felt unable to articulate effectively.
Ultimately, the viral success of this declassified CIA guide serves as a reminder of the enduring relevance of historical documents, the power of collective action, and the creative ways in which people seek to navigate and resist oppressive systems. The sudden popularity of this document highlights a pervasive feeling of powerlessness in modern society and the ongoing search for strategies to regain a sense of agency and control. The guide, while originally intended for a vastly different context, has found a new audience and a new purpose in the contemporary world.