By John Q. Hosedrinker 
At President Trump’s inauguration, Elon Musk, a major Trump donor, performed what many identified as a Nazi salute. This action prompted widespread condemnation, with several prominent figures calling it a clear display of fascist symbolism. However, some media outlets downplayed the event, while others, such as the Washington Post, initially omitted the most egregious portion of the salute from their coverage. The incident highlights the ongoing challenge of combating far-right extremism in media and politics.
Read the original article here
The blatant Nazi salute performed twice by Elon Musk at Trump’s inauguration rally highlights a disturbing trend in US corporate media: a consistent failure to accurately label and condemn such actions. This isn’t a matter of simple journalistic oversight; it represents a deeper, more troubling complicity with the normalization of fascism within American society.
The silence surrounding Musk’s gesture, despite its clear visual nature and historical significance, is deafening. The corporate media, instead of calling it what it was – a Nazi salute – employed euphemisms, avoided direct description, or simply ignored it altogether. This deliberate obfuscation speaks volumes about the priorities of these organizations.
Why this reluctance to accurately depict a clear and unambiguous symbol of hate? The answer lies in a complex interplay of factors, none of which are mutually exclusive. Firstly, the profound influence of money in media ownership creates a pervasive conflict of interest. Billionaires and corporations control significant portions of the media landscape; their interests often align with powerful figures like Trump and Musk, making critical reporting a risky proposition.
Secondly, the media’s own history of complicity with the rise of Trump is relevant. The normalization and “sanewashing” of Trump’s rhetoric and actions in the past – a phenomenon noted by various media critics – have created a precedent where the line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior blurs. This complicity extends to the current situation; to call out Musk’s actions would implicitly critique the broader political environment they helped create and have profited from.
Thirdly, there’s a tangible fear of retribution. Trump and Musk both wield significant power and influence, and both have demonstrated a willingness to attack and silence their critics. This climate of fear can stifle legitimate journalistic inquiry, creating a self-censorship environment where accuracy and integrity are sacrificed for self-preservation. Lawsuits and other forms of intimidation become powerful tools to dissuade critical coverage.
Fourthly, there’s a deep-seated bias, even implicit support, for specific political viewpoints within influential media sectors. A lack of accountability and a conscious decision to favor profit-driven entertainment over serious journalism has created an environment where factual reporting takes a back seat to political posturing and pandering to a particular audience. It’s a cynical calculation that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term credibility and ethical considerations.
Fifthly, the erosion of public trust in mainstream media played a significant role. The constant refrain about “fake news” and “biased media,” skillfully deployed by political actors to discredit opposing viewpoints, has made media outlets more reluctant to make strong, definitive statements that might be subject to intense political backlash. The media’s reliance on ratings and advertising revenue encourages them to play it safe and avoid contentious issues.
The implications of this media failure are profound. When a clear act of fascist symbolism is glossed over or ignored, it sends a chilling message. It normalizes harmful behavior, erodes democratic values, and encourages further polarization. It also undermines the very function of a free press: to hold power accountable and inform the public. By failing to accurately report on Musk’s salute, the media risks exacerbating the very trends it should be challenging.
The consequences go beyond a single gesture. This incident serves as a stark warning: the current corporate media landscape is not equipped to hold powerful figures accountable. If even a clear symbol like a Nazi salute can be sanitized, obfuscated, or ignored, what else will go unreported or misrepresented? The deliberate evasion surrounding Musk’s actions sets a dangerous precedent for the “second Trump era” and beyond, signaling a potentially deep and systemic failure of American media. The question is not just whether they *will* call a Nazi salute a Nazi salute, but whether they even *can*. The very foundations of journalistic integrity are at stake.